In article <7vdo8sfre...@mid.individual.net>,
Gregory Ewing wrote:
>MRAB wrote:
>
>> By the standards of just a few years later, that's not so much a
>> microcomputer as a nanocomputer!
>
>Although not quite as nano as another design published
>in EA a couple of years earlier, the EDUC-8:
>
> h
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:19:03 +1300
Gregory Ewing wrote:
> MRAB wrote:
> > By the standards of just a few years later, that's not so much a
> > microcomputer as a nanocomputer!
>
> Although not quite as nano as another design published
> in EA a couple of years earlier, the EDUC-8:
Byte Magazine
MRAB wrote:
By the standards of just a few years later, that's not so much a
microcomputer as a nanocomputer!
Although not quite as nano as another design published
in EA a couple of years earlier, the EDUC-8:
http://www.sworld.com.au/steven/educ-8/
It had a *maximum* of 256 bytes -- due t
Not to out do you guys, but over here in the states, I started out with
a Radio Shack 'computer' that consisted of 10 slideable switches and 10
flashlight bulbs. You ran wires betweens the slideable switches to
create 'programs'. Wish I could remember what this thing was called - my
google-fu fails
Gregory Ewing wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Mk14 from Science of Cambridge, a kit with hex keypad and 7-segment
display, which I had to solder together, and also make my own power
supply. I had the extra RAM and the I/O chip, so that's 256B (including
the memory used by the monitor) + 256B additional RAM
MRAB wrote:
Mk14 from Science of Cambridge, a kit with hex keypad and 7-segment
display, which I had to solder together, and also make my own power
supply. I had the extra RAM and the I/O chip, so that's 256B (including
the memory used by the monitor) + 256B additional RAM + 128B more in the
I/O
