J Kenneth King schrieb:
I recently started a project called TracShell
(http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
xmlrpclib core module.
When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping each call in try/except
was acceptable. However, this obviously will duplicate code all
Cameron Simpson writes:
> On 17Feb2009 15:12, J Kenneth King wrote:
> | I recently started a project called TracShell
> | (http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
> | xmlrpclib core module.
> |
> | When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping each call in try/excep
On 17Feb2009 15:12, J Kenneth King wrote:
| I recently started a project called TracShell
| (http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
| xmlrpclib core module.
|
| When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping each call in try/except
| was acceptable. [...]
| To combat
"Gabriel Genellina" writes:
> En Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:12:57 -0200, J Kenneth King
> escribió:
>
>> I recently started a project called TracShell
>> (http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
>> xmlrpclib core module.
>>
>> When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping
En Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:12:57 -0200, J Kenneth King
escribió:
I recently started a project called TracShell
(http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
xmlrpclib core module.
When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping each call in try/except
was acceptable. Howeve
I recently started a project called TracShell
(http://code.google.com/p/tracshell) where I make heavy use of the
xmlrpclib core module.
When the number of RPC calls was small, wrapping each call in try/except
was acceptable. However, this obviously will duplicate code all over the
place. There ar
