> Yes. Consider:
>
> >>> def today(time=None, *args):
> ... print "time = ", time, "args = ", args
> ...
> >>> today(2006, 11, 16)
> time = 2006 args = (11, 16)
>
> To fix the issue you'll probably have to remove the time=None parameter from
> GeneralizedTime.__new__() and instead extract it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With assistance from Gabriel and Frederik (and a few old threads in
> c.l.p.) I've been making headway on my specialized datetime class. Now
> I'm puzzled by behavior I didn't expect while attempting to use some of
> the alternate datetime constructors. Specifically, i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With assistance from Gabriel and Frederik (and a few old threads in
> c.l.p.) I've been making headway on my specialized datetime class. Now
> I'm puzzled by behavior I didn't expect while attempting to use some of
> the alternate datetime constructors. Specifically, i
With assistance from Gabriel and Frederik (and a few old threads in
c.l.p.) I've been making headway on my specialized datetime class. Now
I'm puzzled by behavior I didn't expect while attempting to use some of
the alternate datetime constructors. Specifically, it appears if I
call GeneralizedTim
