Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Some approach to support future-proofing in general would seem to be in
> order.
> Given some other precedents, adding a boolean argument called either 'strict'
> or 'lax' would be my preference.
An alternative would be to refactor urllib.parse to use strategy objects
Schimon Jehudah writes:
> Is there an "ignore" option for "urljoin" to allow schemes that are not
> included in the registry of the interpreter of the Python computer
> language?
Some approach to support future-proofing in general would seem to be
in order. Given some other precedents, adding a
Is there an "ignore" option for "urljoin" to allow schemes that are not
included in the registry of the interpreter of the Python computer
language?
I think that it is needed to have, even if it is not registered, as
there are ongoing attempts to try to censor Gemini and Gopher.
gemini://woodpeck
Schimon Jehudah via Python-list writes:
> Yesterday, I have added support for a new syndication format, Gemini
> feed.
I note that 'gemini' is not (yet?) a registered URI scheme:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/uri-schemes.xhtml
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informat
Good day.
Yesterday, I have added support for a new syndication format, Gemini
feed.
Yet, it appears that module urljoin fails at its task, even though
module urlsplit correctly handles Gemini.
Python 3.13.3
>>> from urllib.parse import urljoin
>>> urljoin('gopher://gopher.floodgap.com:70/1/ove
