Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rafe a écrit :
>> On Nov 20, 2:06 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (snip)
>>>
>>> Or (better IMHO) you can make types register themselves with the factory
>>> function (in which case it would have some state so it would make more
>
Rafe a écrit :
On Nov 20, 2:06 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip)
Or (better IMHO) you can make types register themselves with the factory
function (in which case it would have some state so it would make more
sense to make it a factory object).
Can you elaborate on what
On Nov 22, 2:39 am, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> > En Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:36:11 -0200, Stef Mientki
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
> but having struggled with imports in the past,
En Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:39:14 -0200, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:36:11 -0200, Stef Mientki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
but having struggled with imports in the past,
Stef Mientki wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
>> Stef Mientki wrote:
>>
>>> Gabriel Genellina wrote:
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Sorry I don't understand all that pep-talk (I'm not a programmer ;-)
>>>
>>
>> And I'm not a plumber. The difference between us is that I don't write
>> blogs telling p
Steve Holden wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
[...]
Sorry I don't understand all that pep-talk (I'm not a programmer ;-)
And I'm not a plumber. The difference between us is that I don't write
blogs telling people how to lay out and connect their pipework.
Stef Mientki wrote:
> Gabriel Genellina wrote:
[...]
> Sorry I don't understand all that pep-talk (I'm not a programmer ;-)
And I'm not a plumber. The difference between us is that I don't write
blogs telling people how to lay out and connect their pipework.
regards
Steve
PS: Q: What's the diff
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
En Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:36:11 -0200, Stef Mientki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
but having struggled with imports in the past,
I've a solution now, which seems to work quit well.
That's not very helpful, i
Rafe wrote:
On Nov 21, 2:36 am, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
but having struggled with imports in the past,
I've a solution now, which seems to work quit well.
That's not very helpful, is it? Were you planning
En Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:36:11 -0200, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
but having struggled with imports in the past,
I've a solution now, which seems to work quit well.
That's not very helpful, is it? Were you planning t
Rafe wrote:
> On Nov 21, 1:39 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rafe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
>>> module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
>>> my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
>>> M
On Nov 21, 2:36 am, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
> >> but having struggled with imports in the past,
> >> I've a solution now, which seems to work quit well.
>
> > That's not very helpful, is it? Were you planning to kee
On Nov 21, 1:39 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafe wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
> > module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
> > my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
>
> > My problem i
I'm not an expert, I even don't fully understand your problem,
but having struggled with imports in the past,
I've a solution now, which seems to work quit well.
That's not very helpful, is it? Were you planning to keep the solution
secret?
sorry slip of the keyboard ;-)
htt
Stef Mientki wrote:
> Rafe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
>> module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
>> my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
>>
>> My problem is that classes in several modules share a c
Rafe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
> module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
> my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
>
> My problem is that classes in several modules share a common base
> class which ne
Rafe wrote:
Hi,
I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
My problem is that classes in several modules share a common base
class which needs to impleme
On Nov 20, 2:06 pm, Arnaud Delobelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
> > module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
> > my sanity here I would be forever gra
Rafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
> module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
> my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
>
> My problem is that classes in several modules share a common b
Hi,
I am in a situation where I feel I am being forced to abandon a clean
module structure in favor of a large single module. If anyone can save
my sanity here I would be forever grateful.
My problem is that classes in several modules share a common base
class which needs to implement a factory m
20 matches
Mail list logo
