Op Friday 15 May 2015 20:17 CEST schreef Cecil Westerhof:
> While playing with recursion I get:
> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
>
> But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make this
> a lot shorter. Now I ‘lose’ interesting information because of th
Op Friday 15 May 2015 21:04 CEST schreef Ned Batchelder:
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 2:50:12 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> While playing with recursion I get:
>> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
>>
>> But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make
On 16/05/2015 03:51, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 6:54:23 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
While playing with recurs
On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 8:22:05 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 6:54:23 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Saturday, May 16, 2015 at 6:54:23 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >
> > > Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> > >
> > >> While playing with recursion I get:
> > >>
On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 9:33:54 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Ned Batchelder
> wrote:
> > On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> >>
> >> > Cecil Westerhof wr
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>
>> > Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> >
>> >> While playing with recursion I get:
>> >> RuntimeError: maxi
On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 8:57:53 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>
> > Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> >
> >> While playing with recursion I get:
> >> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
> >>
> >> But then
On Sat, 16 May 2015 05:41 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
>> While playing with recursion I get:
>> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
>>
>> But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make this a
>> lot shorter. Now I ‘
Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> While playing with recursion I get:
> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
>
> But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make this a
> lot shorter. Now I ‘lose’ interesting information because of the length of
> the stack trace
A third alternative is to take a look at asyncore.compact_traceback.
That will only help modestly in Cecil's example, but I found it
helpful.
Skip
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 2:50:12 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>> While playing with re
On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 2:50:12 PM UTC-4, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> While playing with recursion I get:
> RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
>
> But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make this a
> lot shorter. Now I 'lose' interesting information
While playing with recursion I get:
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded in comparison
But then I get a very long stack trace. Is there a way to make this a
lot shorter. Now I ‘lose’ interesting information because of the
length of the stack trace.
--
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Softwar
13 matches
Mail list logo