Re: Microsoft research on code quality

2009-11-11 Thread r
On Nov 7, 5:22 pm, Mensanator wrote: > Microsoft has more to answer for for the fuckups they install > deliberately than for the bugs that get in accidentally. Here!, Here! Very well put Mensanator! -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Microsoft research on code quality

2009-11-11 Thread Mark Leander
> http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx Thanks for the link! Hope he next takes on verifying that less code implies less bugs when other factors are constant, thus proving that Python is better than C and Java :-). Mark -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Microsoft research on code quality

2009-11-07 Thread Mensanator
On Nov 6, 3:15 pm, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx > -- > Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)           <*>        http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > [on old computer technologies and programmers]  "Fancy tail fins on a > brand new '5

Re: Microsoft research on code quality

2009-11-07 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
Aahz a écrit : > http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/news/features/nagappan-100609.aspx An interesting reading. Thanks for the link. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list