On Apr 17, 7:13 pm, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> > You can't run Python programs without a Python interpreter installed.
>
> Wrong.
>
> See e.g.http://www.portablepython.com/
In this case Python is still installed on the machine.
It may not be installled on the PC's hard disk but it is certainly
is
On Apr 18, 6:33 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> > Which part of the word "installed" don't you understand while actually
> > using it? >;->
>
> I have various programs which I distribute in zip/tgz format, and also
> as a self-extracting execu
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> Which part of the word "installed" don't you understand while actually
> using it? >;->
I have various programs which I distribute in zip/tgz format, and also
as a self-extracting executable on Windows. Does this mean they need
to be "inst
> >> You can't run Python programs without a Python interpreter
> >> installed.
> >
> > Wrong.
> >
> > See e.g. http://www.portablepython.com/
>
> Uhm... how does that disprove?
Which part of the word "installed" don't you understand while actually
using it? >;->
> Whatever language you distrib
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>> You can't run Python programs without a Python interpreter installed.
>
> Wrong.
>
> See e.g. http://www.portablepython.com/
Uhm... how does that disprove? Whatever language you distributed code
is in, you need something on the computer t
> You can't run Python programs without a Python interpreter installed.
Wrong.
See e.g. http://www.portablepython.com/
BTW: Imho, the Python interpreter should be made
"portable" ("zero-install") _by default_. "Installing" it should be
purely optional.
Sincerely,
Wolfgang Keller
--
http://mai
