> Where can I find a Python functionality like simulink ?
Stef,
I saw this at:
http://showmedo.com/videotutorials/video?name=743&fromSeriesID=743
Ray
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Matlab, from The Mathworks, has a companion product called Simulink.
This allows the user to graphically build ‘algorithms’ in block form.
There is a similar Python function.
Where can I find a Python functionality like simulink ?
thanks,
Stef Mientki
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
On Jul 27, 10:39 am, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
> >> tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
> >> users. It does not make it any faster than running
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
>> tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
>> users. It does not make it any faster than running the software under
>> a python prompt.
>>
>> As much
> It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
> tool, to deploy python software in a form familiar to most windows
> users. It does not make it any faster than running the software under
> a python prompt.
>
> As much as I like python for scientific programming, I would say
>
On 2009-07-27, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
>> ??Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
>
> How inefficient is py2exe.
[Assuming that was a question.]
py2exe just bundles up the files needed to run the p
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
>> Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
>>
>
> How inefficient is py2exe.
It is neither efficient or inefficient: it is just a distribution
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:12:09 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
How inefficient is py2exe. I was under the impression that it's really
not that bad.
py2exe doe
> Creating binaries is not the same as creating /fast, efficient/ binaries.
> Py2Exe bundles it all together, but does not make it any faster.
>
How inefficient is py2exe. I was under the impression that it's really
not that bad.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
--
[corrected top posting]
Mohammad Tayseer wrote:
*From:* Piet van Oostrum
*To:* python-list@python.org
*Sent:* Monday, July 27, 2009 11:18:20 AM
*Subject:* Re: Looking for a dream language: sounds like Python to me.
>>>>> Dotan Cohen mailto:dotanco...@gmail.com>>
27, 2009 11:18:20 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for a dream language: sounds like Python to me.
>>>>> Dotan Cohen (DC) wrote:
>DC> Referring to this article:
>DC>
>http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
>DC
> Dotan Cohen (DC) wrote:
>DC> Referring to this article:
>DC>
>http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
>DC> The author, who is specifically looking for math-related functions, writes:
>DC> """
>DC> The dream algorithm R&D tool woul
Referring to this article:
http://math-blog.com/2009/07/20/complex-algorithm-research-and-development-harder-than-many-think/
The author, who is specifically looking for math-related functions, writes:
"""
The dream algorithm R&D tool would be similar to Matlab or Mathematica
but could be compiled
13 matches
Mail list logo
