Charles Vejnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for both suggestions.
>
> I have indeed tried gmpy. For me, it's not very important to choose between
> numpy or gmpy.
>
> I hope I won't be off topic. But, as I told you before, I have a C library
> using "long double" numbers and I wo
Hi,
Thanks for both suggestions.
I have indeed tried gmpy. For me, it's not very important to choose between
numpy or gmpy.
I hope I won't be off topic. But, as I told you before, I have a C library
using "long double" numbers and I would like to be able to use it in Python.
I try to build a
On May 25, 2:40?pm, Charles Vejnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a C library using "long double" numbers. I would like to be able to
> keep this precision in Python (even if it's not portable) : for the moment I
> have to cast the "long double" numbers to "double" numbers.
>
> 1st sol
Charles Vejnar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a C library using "long double" numbers. I would like to be able to
> keep this precision in Python (even if it's not portable) : for the moment I
> have to cast the "long double" numbers to "double" numbers.
>
> 1st solution . Is it possible that by re-co
Hi,
I have a C library using "long double" numbers. I would like to be able to
keep this precision in Python (even if it's not portable) : for the moment I
have to cast the "long double" numbers to "double" numbers.
1st solution . Is it possible that by re-compiling Python, Python Float object
