Re: Lisp for the C21

2007-05-05 Thread Raffael Cavallaro
On 2007-05-04 11:32:14 -0400, Paul Rubin said: > Anyone who didn't love lisp in the 20th century has no heart. > Anyone who still loves it in the 21st, has no head. By the same logic we should all be conservative Republicans. Given this implication, I'll stick with lis

Re: Lisp for the C21

2007-05-04 Thread Paul Rubin
Mark Tarver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > See my remarks on the Lisp for the Twenty First Century > http://www.lambdassociates.org/lC21.htm Anyone who didn't love lisp in the 20th century has no heart. Anyone who still loves it in the 21st, has no head. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/

Lisp for the C21

2007-05-04 Thread Mark Tarver
QUOTE Python has readable syntax, a huge library, and bindings for what seems like every major in linux. Perl has CPAN. It seems with those languages if you want to do something all you have to do is import functionality from a library someone had written and use that. In lisp you'd have to "roll