On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2014-08-12, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Grant Edwards
>> wrote:
>>> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
>>> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" sy
On 2014-08-12, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
>> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
>> also not included in the 'base-devel' package
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
> also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
> install, but I'd still pretty
On 12.08.2014 09:59, David Palao wrote:
Also Gentoo uses Python3 by default for some months now. The positive
side effect for me has been that I started seriously to switch to
python3.
it's a matter of months for debian/ubuntu to rely only on python3 code
too, while still respecting PEP 394:
2014-08-11 23:36 GMT+02:00 Ned Deily :
> In article ,
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Apparently. Perhaps theres an "enable LSB compliance" option
>> somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
>
> Also beware that, unlike most other distributions and contrary to
> recommended practice,
In article
,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> Well, it only *became* contrary to recommended practice in response to
> Arch doing it and everyone seeing the issues it caused :) Personally,
> I'm glad they did. Lets those of us who follow "slower" distros (I'm
> running Debian) get the benefit of someone
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:23:57 AM UTC+5:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
> also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
> install, but I
On 2014-08-11, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
>> In article ,
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> Apparently. Perhaps theres an "enable LSB compliance" option
>>> somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
>>
>> Also beware that, unlike most o
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ned Deily wrote:
> In article ,
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Apparently. Perhaps theres an "enable LSB compliance" option
>> somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
>
> Also beware that, unlike most other distributions and contrary to
> recommend
In article ,
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Apparently. Perhaps theres an "enable LSB compliance" option
> somewhere in the Arch install docs, but I didn't see it...
Also beware that, unlike most other distributions and contrary to
recommended practice, Arch has chosen to make Python 3 its default, th
On 2014-08-11, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
>> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
>> also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It'
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
> find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
> also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
> install, but I'd still pretty
I just installed Arch Linux for the first time, and was surprosed to
find that Python isn't installed as part of a "base" system. It's
also not included in the 'base-devel' package group. It's trivial to
install, but I'd still pretty surprised it's not there by default. I
guess I've spent too mu
13 matches
Mail list logo
