On Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 7:24:19 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 5:50:24 PM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On 03/06/2015 22:22, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 4:27:39 AM UTC+5:30, Dr. Bigcock wrote:
> > >> We can make Python like LISP:
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 5:50:24 PM UTC-4, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 22:22, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 4:27:39 AM UTC+5:30, Dr. Bigcock wrote:
> >> We can make Python like LISP:
> >>
> >> 1. Make EVERYTHING the same kind of thing (call it "object").
> >> 2
On 03/06/2015 22:22, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 4:27:39 AM UTC+5:30, Dr. Bigcock wrote:
We can make Python like LISP:
1. Make EVERYTHING the same kind of thing (call it "object").
2. Let's make a lot of meta functions like super, instead of judicious use of
interpreter
On Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 4:27:39 AM UTC+5:30, Dr. Bigcock wrote:
> We can make Python like LISP:
>
> 1. Make EVERYTHING the same kind of thing (call it "object").
> 2. Let's make a lot of meta functions like super, instead of judicious use
> of interpreter impositions.
> 3. Forget *practic