On 2011-12-20 19:31, kimma wrote:
I am about to learn python with "how to think like a computer
scientist". This book is just available for python 2.4. Does it matter
for programming?
There is also a online-version for Python 3 but there are some differences:
http://openbookproject.net/thinkcs/
On 21 December 2011 20:06, DJC wrote:
>
> In which case the most important thing is the quality of the book as a
> text on Programming. If you find the the author's style to your taste,
> then use that book rather than struggle with a text based on a recent
> version that you personally find unrea
On 12/20/11 7:31 PM, Rick Johnson wrote:
Anything before Python
3.0 is now obsolete. We are currently at 3.2.2 for a stable release.
2.7 is still a supported production release of Python. It has not been
end-of-lifed.
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
--
http://mail.py
On 21/12/11 02:13, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> I got the impression the OP was learning programming in general (i.e.
> from scratch) and not merely "learning Python". If this is the case it
> shouldn't matter if they're merely learning the concepts as you can
> always get up to speed on the differences l
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> I currently have Python 2.7 and Python 3.2.2 installed on my machine.
> I don't use Python 2.7 because i am a member of some secret "Python
> Historical Commission"
Shun 3.2.2, it's way too old. The ONLY version of Python worth using
is the b
On Dec 20, 8:13 pm, Ashton Fagg wrote:
> On 21 December 2011 10:31, Rick Johnson wrote:
> I got the impression the OP was learning programming in general (i.e.
> from scratch) and not merely "learning Python". If this is the case it
> shouldn't matter if they're merely learning the concepts as y
On 21 December 2011 10:31, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Kimma, don't listen to either of these guys. Anything before Python
> 3.0 is now obsolete. We are currently at 3.2.2 for a stable release.
> If a tutorial writer is too lazy to update his tutorial to AT LEAST
> Python 3.0, THEN he is a fool and shou
I'd recommend starting with http://learnpythonthehardway.org/book/ by "Zed
Shaw" or Beginning Python Using Python 2.6 and Python 3.1 by "James Payne"
I'd say learning Python 2.6 would be better than 2.4, since it's really old.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 20, 12:31 pm, kimma wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am about to learn python with "how to think like a computer
> scientist". This book is just available for python 2.4. Does it matter
> for programming?
>
> Greetz
Kimma, don't listen to either of these guys. Anything before Python
3.0 is now obs
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:31:56 +0100, kimma wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am about to learn python with "how to think like a computer
> scientist". This book is just available for python 2.4. Does it matter
> for programming?
Python 2.4 is pretty old, and missing a lot of really cool features that
cam
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:31 AM, kimma wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am about to learn python with "how to think like a computer scientist".
> This book is just available for python 2.4. Does it matter for programming?
>
> Greetz
Python 2.4 is pretty old at this point. A lot has been added to the
la
Hi there,
I am about to learn python with "how to think like a computer
scientist". This book is just available for python 2.4. Does it matter
for programming?
Greetz
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
12 matches
Mail list logo
