[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is Python actively developed and supported on Linux?
Yes. In fact, Red Hat's installation and administration tools are
written in Python and have been for a decade (give or take a year or
two).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> Can anyone recommend an open source IDE for Python that runs on Linux?
A lot of SPE (http://pythonide.stani.be) users are on all kinds of
Linux flavours (but also Mac OSX and windows). I've started to use SPE
on Ubuntu. There could be some improvements. As soon as I have time
I'll implement them
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> these days, most end users get their Python either with their OS,
> or by downloading a prebuilt installer.
Oh, ok. I've just never heard such people referred to as "the
distributors" before. It sounds like some sort of TV series! ;-)
>> I gu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I guess I just don't get why the inclusion of the pysqlite wrapper
>is so exciting if all it's doing is changing the situation from
>"Python does not come with a DB, but you can install extra software
>to provide one" to "Py
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> "The distributors"? Que?
all the downstream people who work their asses off to provide pre-
built, pre-tested distributions for various platforms. this includes the
PSF volunteers, commercial actors, and a large crowd of linux/bsd
volunteers.
these days, most end users get
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> Apologies if I'm being obtuse, but how does including the pysqlite
>> wrapper module change anything? You still need to download and install
>> SQLite
>
> I'm pretty sure the distributors will do this for you, just as
> they've included zlib,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Lambacher wrote:
> At least on windows. PySqlite is statically linked with the sqlite library.
> This can be done because it is quite small.
OK, well that makes sense, but why not on any other platform?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Aahz wrote:
>> Indeed, I think the inclusion of ctypes is far and away the most
>> exciting thing in 2.5.
>
> Really? More than pysqlite?
My personal fave is the "with" statement. It makes a lot of code so much
more elegant - esp. for things which are getting built-in context
managers (e.g. fil
At least on windows. PySqlite is statically linked with the sqlite library.
This can be done because it is quite small.
-Chris
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 06:51:24PM +, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aahz wrote:
> > On that front, I think that pysqlite is much more importan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aahz wrote:
>>
>> On that front, I think that pysqlite is much more important because
>> it finally gets rid of the excuse for using Berkeley for simple
>> database purposes.
>
>Apologies if I'm
Jarek Zgoda wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
>
>
>> Is Python actively developed and supported on Linux? Would it be a
>> viable option for cross-platform application development?
>>
>
> Yeas and yeas. Yeas. (That's how we pronounce "yes" here, in Poland,
> East Europe).
>
>
>> Can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
> Is Python actively developed and supported on Linux? Would it be a
> viable option for cross-platform application development?
Yeas and yeas. Yeas. (That's how we pronounce "yes" here, in Poland,
East Europe).
> Can anyone recommend an open source IDE for Python t
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> Apologies if I'm being obtuse, but how does including the pysqlite
> wrapper module change anything? You still need to download and install
> SQLite
I'm pretty sure the distributors will do this for you, just as they've included
zlib, dbm, tcl/tk, openssl, and many other stan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Aahz wrote:
> On that front, I think that pysqlite is much more important because
> it finally gets rid of the excuse for using Berkeley for simple
> database purposes.
Apologies if I'm being obtuse, but how does including the pysqlite
wrapper module change anything
Aahz wrote:
> Heh. Since we're just finally turning in our 100% first draft of Python
> for Dummies, I tend to think more in terms of what a Python newbie will
> find useful. On that front, I think that pysqlite is much more
> important because it finally gets rid of the excuse for using Berkele
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Indeed, I think the inclusion of ctypes is far and away the most exciting
>>>thing in 2.5.
>>
>> Really? More than pysqlite?
>
>T
Aahz wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Indeed, I think the inclusion of ctypes is far and away the most exciting
>>thing in 2.5.
>
> Really? More than pysqlite?
To me much more. After all, why would I need pysqlite if I use
PostgreSQL? ;-)
/me
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
>>
>> Consider for example that one of the additions to Python 2.5 (currently
>> in alpha stage) is the inclusion in the Python standard library of
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've traditionally been a Java developer, although I play around with
> LISP. I recently migrated to Linux and I was exploring Mono as an
> option for development on Linux. However, I've had some problems with
> the maturity and support when working with Mono. So I was co
You don't actually *need* a libglade/pyGtk IDE: glade will be more than
enough :-)
By its very nature glade will enable you to design the GUI and define
the signals.
Then you'll load the glade file in python, and use whatever editor you
feel comfortable with.
--
Have fun,
Renato Ramonda
--
ht
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
> Consider for example that one of the additions to Python 2.5 (currently
> in alpha stage) is the inclusion in the Python standard library of
> ctypes
Indeed, I think the inclusion of ctypes is far and away the most exci
Ravi Teja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've traditionally been a Java developer, although I play around with LISP.
>
> For most java developers, understanding dynamic typing is a big step.
> Your Lisp background however would mean that you will pick up Python
> very quickly.
Very good point.
Ravi Teja wrote:
> >> I've traditionally been a Java developer, although I play around with LISP.
>
> For most java developers, understanding dynamic typing is a big step.
> Your Lisp background however would mean that you will pick up Python
> very quickly.
>
> >> I recently migrated to Linux and
>> I've traditionally been a Java developer, although I play around with LISP.
For most java developers, understanding dynamic typing is a big step.
Your Lisp background however would mean that you will pick up Python
very quickly.
>> I recently migrated to Linux and I was exploring Mono as an
op
I've traditionally been a Java developer, although I play around with
LISP. I recently migrated to Linux and I was exploring Mono as an
option for development on Linux. However, I've had some problems with
the maturity and support when working with Mono. So I was considering
Python as an alternativ
25 matches
Mail list logo
