Excellent, thank you.
http://bugs.python.org/issue14573
-alfred
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:55:19 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> At some point, you'll have to port your patch to the latest codebase
>
> Okay, done.
>
> https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/master
>
> Iterators for JSON is now
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:55:19 PM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> At some point, you'll have to port your patch to the latest codebase
Okay, done.
https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/master
Iterators for JSON is now Python 3 ready.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:07:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
>> > What do you think now?
>>
>> I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getting
>> new featu
On Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:07:23 AM UTC-7, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> > What do you think now?
>
> I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getting
> new features. That won't be merged into trunk. Does your patch apply
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Alfred Morgan wrote:
> I added a stream flag (off by default) and also added file streaming (thanks
> for the idea).
>
> https://github.com/Zectbumo/cpython/compare/2.7
>
> What do you think now?
I think that you're adding features to Python 2.7, which isn't getti
On Monday, September 29, 2014 7:10:18 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> This would cause things that aren't lists to be encoded as lists.
> Sometimes that may be desirable, but in general if e.g. a file object
> sneaks its way into your JSON encode call, it is more likely correct
> to raise an error than to s
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 7:19 PM, wrote:
> I would like to add the ability to JSONEncode large iterators. Right now
> there is no way to do this without modifying the code.
>
> The JSONEncoder.default() doc string suggests to do this:
> For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you cou
I would like to add the ability to JSONEncode large iterators. Right now there
is no way to do this without modifying the code.
The JSONEncoder.default() doc string suggests to do this:
For example, to support arbitrary iterators, you could
implement default like this::
