Re: JMS yet again

2005-11-16 Thread Mike Meyer
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am I the only person who immediately thought of Babylon 5 and >> wondered if I was in the wrong newsgroup? > > I plead guilty. Well, I thought of Crusade. But I'd just finished watching those. htt

Re: JMS yet again

2005-11-16 Thread Ben Finney
Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am I the only person who immediately thought of Babylon 5 and > wondered if I was in the wrong newsgroup? I plead guilty. -- \ "I like to reminisce with people I don't know. Granted, it | `\ takes longer." -- Steven

Re: JMS yet again

2005-11-16 Thread Aahz
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] Am I the only person who immediately thought of Babylon 5 and wondered if I was in the wrong newsgroup? -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "If you think it's expensiv

JMS yet again

2005-11-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've seen various posts over the years asking if python can be used to communicate with JMS queues (whether MQ series, Jboss queues etc etc). I've seen solutions such as pymqi (good for MQ, but not for jboss I believe), and JPype. This must seem an obvious question, but has anyone actually tried