Thomas Rachel wrote:
> class AllList(list):
> """list which can be called in order to be used as a
> __all__-adding
> decorator"""
Wow, this is a great idea.
--
--OKB (not okblacke)
Brendan Barnwell
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is
no path,
On 07/29/2011 08:37 AM, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 28.07.2011 20:01 schrieb Ian Kelly:
The advantage of Thomas's decorator here is that it lets you place the
denotation of whether a function is exported alongside its definition,
whereas simply declaring the __all__ list forces you to separate them
Thomas,
A ha! Now I feel all warm and fuzzy inside. It's nice to start the day with
learning something new.
To be honest, the initial problem was that I didn't understand the meaning
of '__all__', again probably from not working in the large with python.
After posting, I went and had another go a
Am 28.07.2011 20:01 schrieb Ian Kelly:
The advantage of Thomas's decorator here is that it lets you place the
denotation of whether a function is exported alongside its definition,
whereas simply declaring the __all__ list forces you to separate them.
It also avoids the problem of possibly mis
Thomas Rachel wrote:
Why not? But you could even do
class AllList(list):
"""list which can be called in order to be used as a __all__-adding
decorator"""
def __call__(self, obj):
"""for decorators"""
self.append(obj.__name__)
return obj
__all__ = AllList()
@__
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:22 AM, mark ferguson wrote:
> I've not really got the hang of decorators yet, so I was wondering why one
> might use your approach rather than just using Karim's original method?
The advantage of Thomas's decorator here is that it lets you place the
denotation of whether
HI Thomas,
I've not really got the hang of decorators yet, so I was wondering why one
might use your approach rather than just using Karim's original method?
I only really use python for smallish, utility programs, so I suppose I
haven't come across an issue complex enough to see a clear advantag
On 07/28/2011 02:29 PM, Thomas Rachel wrote:
__all__ = AllList()
Hello Thomas,
Very beautiful and elegant code. Having both at the same time an
instance and a method...
With this 'small' topic, you taught me something today on property
application!
Cheers
Karim
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
Am 28.07.2011 13:32 schrieb Karim:
Hello,
__all__ = 'api db input output tcl'.split()
or
__all__ = """
api
db
input
output
tcl
""".split()
for lazy boy ;o). It is readable as well.
What do you think?
Why not? But you could even do
class AllList(list):
"""list which can be called in or
Karim writes:
> Hello,
>
> __all__ = 'api db input output tcl'.split()
>
> or
>
> __all__ = """
>api
>db
>input
>output
>tcl
>""".split()
Maybe this:
__all__ = [x.__name__ for x in [
api,
Hello,
__all__ = 'api db input output tcl'.split()
or
__all__ = """
api
db
input
output
tcl
""".split()
for lazy boy ;o). It is readable as well.
What do you think?
Cheers
Karim
--
http://mail.python.or
11 matches
Mail list logo
