Thanks everyone for the help. I got my app working with using cython to
generate the c code, cl to compile, and visual studio to create the
setup.exe and the msi installer. I appreciate the help.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Jim Schwartz
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023
MRAB wrote:
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris
wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
Is this what you'd recommend doing when distributing a cython-generated code
compiled with cl. I want to distribute this in a windows or other operating
system installer. I'll start with windows first. I don't think I can use
cx_freeze to create the installer, unless I know
From: Eryk Sun
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 8:06 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH
&
On 4/6/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> Never mind. I found it on the web. I needed to point my PYTHONPATH to
> sitepackages:
In most cases an application should be isolated from PYTHON*
environment variables. If you're creating a Python application or
embedding Python in an application, use the embed
'
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: RE: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
I downloaded VS community 2022 and I know how to access the developer command
prompt. I'm using the one called x64 Native Tools Command Prompt for VS 2022
I ran a comman
On 2023-04-06 23:14, Jim Schwartz wrote:
Could someone please help Carlos? I’m not sure how to answer his
question
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 6, 2023, at 3:53 PM, Carlos Fulqueris wrote:
Hello Jim,
How can I unsubscribe to this email list?
I'm wait
arrys-emacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz <[3]jsch...@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Eryk Sun <[4]eryk...@gmail.com>; [5]python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access
to source cod
4, 2023 1:25 PM
To: Jim Schwartz
Cc: Eryk Sun ; python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code without access to source
code
> On 4 Apr 2023, at 16:28, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Where can I download that cl program? I've used gcc before, but I hear
> On 4 Apr 2023, at 16:28, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Where can I download that cl program? I've used gcc before, but I hear that
> cl can use a setup.py program to run the compile and link and create a
> windows .msi installer. Is that true?
It is part of visual studi
Where can I download that cl program? I've used gcc before, but I hear that cl
can use a setup.py program to run the compile and link and create a windows
.msi installer. Is that true?
-Original Message-
From: Eryk Sun
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 12:55 PM
To: Jim Schwart
On 4/1/2023 5:24 AM, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 20:24, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
> GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really
> understand licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with
> my worry abo
I am writing an app but I’m not sure I’ll sell it yet. I have it in a private
GitHub location and GitHub prompts me for a license. I don’t really understand
licenses so I just picked Apache 2.0. Maybe I’m going too far with my worry
about which license I pick. I’m not selling it now so it doesn’
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 13:16, <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> > service [...]
>
> You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser
On 2023-04-01 at 10:49:18 +1100,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> [...] I don't have access to the Gmail source code but I'm using the
> service [...]
You have access to Gmail's front end source code. Your web browser runs
it every time you use the service (and probably while you aren't using
the servic
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 10:34, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> Yea. You’re right. I probably need a lawyer someday. Thanks.
>
If your needs are basic, you shouldn't need a lawyer. Copyright law
and treaties DO protect you. But it's important to be aware that no
amount of legal protection - whether you hire
r who
> practices in this field.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Python-list On
>> Behalf Of Chris Angelico
>> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
>> To: python-list@python.org
>> Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
phone apps
developers include with their apps. And it would be good to consult a
lawyer who practices in this field.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python s
What license do I have to choose so people can't use my code? I don't know
this stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 7:09 AM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Windows installer from python source code with
On 3/31/23, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Cython can compile a script to C source code for a module or
executable (--embed). The source can
On 31/03/2023 13:00, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Others have commented that at some level it will always be thre but on a
more pragmatic
On 3/31/2023 10:14 AM, jkn wrote:
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to
On Friday, March 31, 2023 at 1:09:12 PM UTC+1, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
> >
> > I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> > python, but I don't want the end user t
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 23:01, Jim Schwartz wrote:
>
> I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
> python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
>
>
>
> Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze,
I want a windows installer to install my application that's written in
python, but I don't want the end user to have access to my source code.
Is that possible using python? I was using cx-freeze, but that has the
source code available. So does pyinstaller. I think gcc does, too
Dear list,
>>So please check that you are running the right version of Python when
>>you type "python".
If i type “python”, it is
C:\>python -V
Python 3.11.0
Von: Thomas Passin
Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. November 2022 16:18
An: darkst...@o2online.de
On 11/13/2022
On 11/12/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
>
import _tkinter
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> ImportError: DLL load failed while importing _tkinter: Das angegebene Modul
> wurd
> e nicht gefunden.
Loading the extension module "_tkinter.pyd" tries to load two TCL
gram Files. You can look again in the entire
> disk (assuming it's on the c: drive, which is almost certainly so):
>
> where /R c:\% python.exe
>
> > Von: darkst...@o2online.de
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. November 2022 15:10
> > An: Eryk Sun
>
>
>
>
> Yes, there is always the message “modified successfull”, “installed
sucessfully”, but IDLE does’t start. I tried it with the newer Version,
too. Ist 3.11.0 for 32 bit, but it also doesn’t work. Do you have other
suggetions, that it works?
>
>
>
>
On 11/11/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
>
> What can I do for the next step to find, why IDLE isn’t working?
The question is why tkinter isn't working. IDLE not working is just a
symptom of the underlying problem. In the command prompt, run 32-bit
Python 3.10 via `py -3.10-32`. In Python's inte
I tried it with the newer
Version, too. Ist 3.11.0 for 32 bit, but it also doesn’t work. Do you
have other suggetions, that it works?
Von: Eryk Sun
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. November 2022 22:50
An: darkst...@o2online.de
Cc: python-list@python.org
On 11/3/22, darkst...@o2onlin
On 11/9/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
> Is there no one who can help?
If you can't run IDLE via `py -3.10-32 -m idlelib`, then something
isn't installed properly. You reported an error that IDLE fails to
load because importing tkinter fails. Did you try `import tkinter` in
the REPL? tkinter de
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:02:44 +, declaimed the
following:
>Is there no one who can help?
>
Your problem description isn't detailed enough to even guess what you
are finding incorrect.
If you are on Windows, once you've done an install, shove the installer
fi
22:50
An: darkst...@o2online.de
Cc: python-list@python.org
On 11/3/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
Is there a reason, why it is not installed? Its the same check mark in the
installer like IDLE…
Did you try what I suggested? Modify the installation to remove the
tkinter/IDLE component. T
son, why it is not installed? Its the same check mark in the
> installer like IDLE…
Did you try what I suggested? Modify the installation to remove the
tkinter/IDLE component. Then modify it again to select the component
to be reinstalled. Also, try to repair the installation. This may
reset an
. November 2022 22:50
An: darkst...@o2online.de
Cc: python-list@python.org
On 11/3/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
> Is there a reason, why it is not installed? Its the same check mark in the
> installer like IDLE…
Did you try what I suggested? Modify the installation to remove the
t
On 11/3/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
> Is there a reason, why it is not installed? Its the same check mark in the
> installer like IDLE…
Did you try what I suggested? Modify the installation to remove the
tkinter/IDLE component. Then modify it again to select the component
to be reins
On 11/1/22, Nithish Ramasamy wrote:
>
> pip install tkinter
> Wait some minutes to install tkinter
There is no tkinter package on PyPI. It's part of the standard library
and included with the python.org installer as an optional component.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/1/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
>
> **IDLE can’t Import TKINTER
>
> Python may not be configured for TK**
>
> Checkmark for TK is set in the Installation Progress. What went wrong and ho
> can I fix it?
Run the following command to check whether the ImportError has any
further informatio
On 10/31/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
>
> I installed the Standard Distribution from python.org again, and i ensured,
> that the checkmark test Suite is enabled. Idle does’nt start. The installer
> says “Installation successfully” at the end.
>
> What went wrong and how can
On 10/31/22, darkst...@o2online.de wrote:
>
> i uninstalled this, because my Idle doesn’t start by clicking on the Icon.
> Are there any Solutions for the problem?
If it's the standard distribution from python.org, run the installer
again, and ensure that the test suite is install
Dear Sir or Madam,
i uninstalled this, because my Idle doesn’t start by clicking on the Icon. Are
there any Solutions for the problem?
Thanks,
André
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
poniedziałek, 16 kwietnia 2018 o 10:51:37 UTC+2 jtsh...@gmail.com napisał(a):
> On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:46:24 AM UTC+5:30, Jean-Claude Roy wrote:
> > I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
> > The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose
On Monday, 6 February 2017 16:16:24 UTC+11, Jean-Claude Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
> The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
> "install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
> Now the trouble s
On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 2:14:48 AM UTC+5:30, christia...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Same with me, except that I tried to install Python 3.6.3. Unchecking
> "Install launcher for all users" helped, however.
Thank you. It helped me.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 7:44:48 AM UTC+11, christian...@gmail.com wrote:
> Same with me, except that I tried to install Python 3.6.3. Unchecking
> "Install launcher for all users" helped, however.
It works perfectly by unchecking that box! Thanks!!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/list
Same problem, Win7, Unchecking "Install launcher for all users" sorted things.
Thanks for the advice.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 6:16:24 AM UTC+1, Jean-Claude Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
> The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
> "install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
> Now the troub
On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:46:24 AM UTC+5:30, Jean-Claude Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
> The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
> "install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
> Now the t
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 12:44:48 PM UTC-8, christian...@gmail.com wrote:
> Same with me, except that I tried to install Python 3.6.3. Unchecking
> "Install launcher for all users" helped, however.
This worked for me, thanks!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 14:45:23 UTC+1, eng@voepassaredo.com.br wrote:
> Hi! Exact same problem here! Stucked at "initializing setup", windows 7,
> pyhton 3.6.4, etc, etc, etc
>
> However, while looking for solutions on the internet.. guess who's decided to
> come to party??? Setup f
Hi! Exact same problem here! Stucked at "initializing setup", windows 7, pyhton
3.6.4, etc, etc, etc
However, while looking for solutions on the internet.. guess who's decided to
come to party??? Setup finally started! I guess we just have to be pacient and
give its time...
--
https://mail
On 12/29/2017 11:38 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 29 December 2017 at 16:04, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thanks. I'll shoot Thomas Heller an email...
Actually, make that Christopher Toth. Seems he's the current maintainer.
If you get no joy there, then in a week or two, when I next get access
to a sy
On 29 December 2017 at 16:04, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>> Thanks. I'll shoot Thomas Heller an email...
>
>
> Actually, make that Christopher Toth. Seems he's the current maintainer.
If you get no joy there, then in a week or two, when I next get access
to a system with a Python 2.x build environment
> Thanks. I'll shoot Thomas Heller an email...
Actually, make that Christopher Toth. Seems he's the current maintainer.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> That's not an architecture-independent file. The Wheel spec gives all
> the details, but "cp27" (as opposed to "py27") means it's CPython only
> (which usually means it's got a C extension) and "win32" is 32-bit
> only ("win_amd64" is the tag for 64-bit Windows). So the problem is
> that the py2e
On 28 December 2017 at 17:49, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> pip install py2exe_py2 pypiwin32 Pillow lockfile
> Collecting py2exe_py2
> Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement py2exe_py2
> (from versions: )
>
> That error message isn't telling me much about why the requirement
> isn't sat
Thanks for the help, Paul.
> When I took a quick look at the code, it seemed to be based on a
> pretty old version of Python. What version are you using?
Yes, last time a Windows installer was created, Python 2.5 was still
in vogue. I switched things to 2.7 with (so far) no obvious proble
heel - you
may need to ask the project maintainers for advice.
Paul
On 27 December 2017 at 14:58, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I'm fiddling around with Appveyor, trying to build a Windows installer
> for SpamBayes. This is complicated by two facts:
>
> 1. I don't know s
I'm fiddling around with Appveyor, trying to build a Windows installer
for SpamBayes. This is complicated by two facts:
1. I don't know squat about Windows.
2. I don't have access to a Windows command line.
Consequently, every new attempt requires a change to appveyor.yml and
a g
On Monday, December 4, 2017 at 3:44:48 PM UTC-5, christian...@gmail.com wrote:
> Same with me, except that I tried to install Python 3.6.3. Unchecking
> "Install launcher for all users" helped, however.
I'm having the same issue. I need Python to be available for all users. Has
anyone found a s
Same with me, except that I tried to install Python 3.6.3. Unchecking "Install
launcher for all users" helped, however.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 27/07/2017 20:55, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> I need to installed Python 3.6.x on Windows as part of an automated process
> without user-interaction. Recently Python releases provided MSI files for
> installation using the "msiexec" utility however there are no more MSI
> release files available
I need to installed Python 3.6.x on Windows as part of an automated process
without user-interaction. Recently Python releases provided MSI files for
installation using the "msiexec" utility however there are no more MSI release
files available for Python 3.6.X. Are there any alternatives?
-aj
Thanks a lot.
1 июля 2017 г. 0:16 пользователь "eryk sun" написал:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Debiller 777
> wrote:
> > I just get error that there is no module name 'encodings'
>
> First make sure that neither PYTHONHOME nor PYTHONPATH are defined in
> your environment. To check this t
суббота, 1 июля 2017 г., 0:25:19 UTC+3 пользователь eryk sun написал:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Debiller 777
> wrote:
> > I just get error that there is no module name 'encodings'
>
> First make sure that neither PYTHONHOME nor PYTHONPATH are defined in
> your environment. To check this
d
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Debiller 777 wrote:
> I just get error that there is no module name 'encodings'
First make sure that neither PYTHONHOME nor PYTHONPATH are defined in
your environment. To check this type `set python` in a command prompt.
Neither variable should be listed.
--
http
How can I fully expierence Python if installer installs wrong?
How? I am really tired of this. I even checked PC on viruses and malwares, but
no this glitch HAPPENS. Pleas help to fix this problem and normally program on
Python!!!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, 6 February 2017 13:16:24 UTC+8, Jean-Claude Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
> The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
> "install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
> Now the trouble st
On 2/6/2017 12:03 AM, Jean-Claude Roy via Python-list wrote:
I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
"install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
Now the trouble starts:I get "
I am trying to install Python 3.6.0 on a Windows 7 computer.
The download of 29.1 MB is successful and I get the nextwindow. I choose the
"install now" selection and thatopens the Setup Program window.
Now the trouble starts:I get "Installing:" and the Initialization
progress...and nothing els
On 3/11/2016 2:37 PM, Tim Golden wrote:
On 11/03/2016 19:24, Giga Image wrote:
On Soruceforge, Python for Windows Extension, I noticed that they
already haven a installer for Python 3.6.
Where do I find Python 3.6 installer for Win64. I couldn't find it on
Python.org/download page.
On Friday, March 11, 2016 at 11:38:09 AM UTC-8, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 19:24, Giga Image wrote:
> > On Soruceforge, Python for Windows Extension, I noticed that they
> > already haven a installer for Python 3.6.
> >
> > Where do I find Python 3.6 installer fo
On 11/03/2016 19:24, Giga Image wrote:
On Soruceforge, Python for Windows Extension, I noticed that they
already haven a installer for Python 3.6.
Where do I find Python 3.6 installer for Win64. I couldn't find it on
Python.org/download page.
The pywin32 crew are always ahead of the
On Soruceforge, Python for Windows Extension, I noticed that they already haven
a installer for Python 3.6.
Where do I find Python 3.6 installer for Win64. I couldn't find it on
Python.org/download page.
Thanks!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
indows 95, because it's simply an unsupported operating
>> system. The only reason that people keep coming asking about XP and not
>> (say) Win2K is that there are a lot more XP boxes out there. Do the
>> other download pages need to stipulate which versions of which OSes
&
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 at 2:48:58 PM UTC-7, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
> message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
> todo list for more than a week now.
>
> Not sure why it hasn't happened.
>
> Thank you for the reminder.
You're welcom
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:43 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Remember, people can click a direct download link
>> *on the python.org front page* and be immediately downloading Python 2
>> or 3 for the OS that the browser announces. Where would y
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 03:43 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Remember, people can click a direct download link
> *on the python.org front page* and be immediately downloading Python 2
> or 3 for the OS that the browser announces. Where would you put the
> big fat noisy warning?
Maybe the website shouldn'
On 11/1/2015 10:54 AM, Michiel Overtoom wrote:
On 01 Nov 2015, at 16:43, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that
offer a Windows download not say a word about it not running on
Windows XP?
I'm also curious why Python 3.5 won't run on Wi
On 11/1/2015 5:28 PM, boB Stepp wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
todo list for more than a week now.
Not sure why it hasn't happened.
Thank you for the reminder.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:28 AM, boB Stepp wrote:
> Of course if such
> people would only type in their issue into their favorite search
> engine... But that is a different issue--heavy sigh!
In their defense, "the installer for Python has a blank window" isn't
nearly a
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
> message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
> todo list for more than a week now.
>
> Not sure why it hasn't happened.
>
> Thank you for the reminder.
I have to confess I do not unde
Actually, adding the XP - do not look here --
message for several webpages has been on the pydotorg
todo list for more than a week now.
Not sure why it hasn't happened.
Thank you for the reminder.
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2015-11-01 19:41, rurpy--- via Python-list wrote:
On 11/01/2015 09:43 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:24 AM, rurpy--- via Python-list
wrote:
[snip]
That is really shitty customer relations.
See above, and define 'customer'.
customer: the people to whom you are provi
g that Python-3.5 will not run on XP and suggesting a
low-cost way to reduce that problem.
>>> There *is* a plan to have the installer give a better error message
>>> for this situation.
>>
>> A better message from the installer is necessary but not sufficient.
>>
ept it _doesn't_ work fine, or they wouldn't be complaining.
>
>If you want to run Python 3.5, then XP just doesn't work. Why they
>think it's Python's fault is the question...
>
>--
>Grant
:)
Actually, the people I talk to are to be forgiven for not un
On 2015-11-01, Laura Creighton wrote:
> The whole message of 'get a newer os' is decidedly hard for them.
> "It works fine, like my 2004 Ford car" they want to tell you.
Except it _doesn't_ work fine, or they wouldn't be complaining.
If you want to run Python 3.5, then XP just doesn't work. Wh
The important thing is that, numbers-wise, windowsXP was the
version of computer a whole lot of people got when they got
their first computer.
The notion of, not it "wearing out" but that the whole world
"wore out" or "advanced beyond" them is foreign to them.
They aren't computer-hobbyists -- t
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 11/01/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Windows XP has now been around for twelve years.
>
> It's older than that. Release date was August 1, 2001. More than 14
> years ago. My how the time flies.
>
> Though more recent versions o
XP.
>
> You acknowledge yourself: "there are a lot more XP boxes out there."
Yes, there are. This is not a customer base; they are not paying me,
nor (as far as I know) the PSF, to support them.
>> There *is* a plan to have the installer give a better error message
>>
On 11/01/2015 03:08 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Windows XP has now been around for twelve years.
It's older than that. Release date was August 1, 2001. More than 14
years ago. My how the time flies.
Though more recent versions of Windows have added features (which Python
now takes advantage o
king about XP and
> not (say) Win2K is that there are a lot more XP boxes out there. Do
> the other download pages need to stipulate which versions of which
> OSes they support, or should that be left up to the installer?
I dont recall seeing anyone posting asking why they could not get
> On 01 Nov 2015, at 16:43, rurpy--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Why, oh why, do the python.org front page and other pages that offer
> a Windows download not say a word about it not running on Windows XP?
I'm also curious why Python 3.5 won't run on Windows XP. Which features does it
use th
they support, or should that be left up to the installer?
There *is* a plan to have the installer give a better error message
for this situation. But I don't think the web site necessarily has to
have noise about old versions of OSes. Where would you draw the line?
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/01/2015 03:06 AM, Chris Warrick wrote:
> On 1 November 2015 at 09:23, t_ciorba--- via Python-list
> wrote:
>>
>> hi, i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer
>> for windows XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to
>> select
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 11:24:55 +0100, Laura Creighton writes:
>In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:23:15 +0200, t_ciorba--- via Python-list wr
>ites:
>>hi,
>>i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
>>XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i co
In a message of Sun, 01 Nov 2015 10:23:15 +0200, t_ciorba--- via Python-list wr
ites:
>hi,
>i am not sure what is wrong, but after launching the installer for windows
>XPsp3 python-3.5.0.exe i couldnt see what i have to select, it was a white
>board and the only button on it was &q
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
