On Mar 6, 10:47 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST)
>
> Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk*
> > > certain posters.
>
> > > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I gue
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST)
Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk*
> > certain posters.
> >
> > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess.
>
> Sounds like you need better filtering.
>
> A decent news filter sh
On Mar 5, 8:11 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100
>
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop
> > > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this
> > > imposs
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop
> > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this
> > impossible.
>
> Not at all. AFAIK the messages from Google mail correctly include
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST)
> Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you
> please include the full address.
It's a misfe
