blaine wrote:
> I didn't mean anything by it, I promise. This group is just
> amazing - there are always very active topics and I get responses
> in no time. The wxPython group I noticed only has had recent
> discussions a few times in the past month, and their subscribers
> aren't as high as the
On Apr 30, 1:09 pm, blaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 1:14 pm, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > blaine wrote:
> > > The wxPython group is a bit stale compared to this group, so I'll give
> > > it a shot :)
>
> > What does that mean? The wxPython group is almost always ver
On Apr 30, 1:14 pm, Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> blaine wrote:
> > The wxPython group is a bit stale compared to this group, so I'll give
> > it a shot :)
>
> What does that mean? The wxPython group is almost always very quick to
> respond with relevant answers.
>
> As to your questio
blaine wrote:
> The wxPython group is a bit stale compared to this group, so I'll give
> it a shot :)
>
What does that mean? The wxPython group is almost always very quick to
respond with relevant answers.
As to your question, I think Peter is correct. Your wx.py and wx.pyc
files are masking th
blaine wrote:
> The wxPython group is a bit stale compared to this group, so I'll give
> it a shot :)
>
> (READ: Originally when I started htis post, Python 2.5 at the shell
> did not work (identical behavior to eclipse). I'm not sure why, but
> it has since worked fine with no problems. Not su
The wxPython group is a bit stale compared to this group, so I'll give
it a shot :)
(READ: Originally when I started htis post, Python 2.5 at the shell
did not work (identical behavior to eclipse). I'm not sure why, but
it has since worked fine with no problems. Not sure whats going on
there...
