In article , Aahz wrote:
>In article ,
>Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>>
>>While I don't fully understand what you're trying to accomplish by
>>changing the URL to google.com after 3 iterations, I suspect that some
>>of your trouble comes from using "while True". Your code would be
>>clearer if
In article ,
Philip Semanchuk wrote:
>
>While I don't fully understand what you're trying to accomplish by
>changing the URL to google.com after 3 iterations, I suspect that some
>of your trouble comes from using "while True". Your code would be
>clearer if the while clause actually stated
Brian D wrote:
[...]
> I'm definitely acquiring some well-deserved schooling -- and it's
> really appreciated. I'd seen the "is/is not" preference before, but it
> just didn't stick.
>
Yes, a lot of people have acquired the majority of their Python
education from this list - I have certainly learn
On Dec 30, 7:08 pm, MRAB wrote:
> Brian D wrote:
> > Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
> > pile of essential documentation.
>
> > To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
> > module the essential components of the solution I got to
Brian D wrote:
Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
pile of essential documentation.
To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
module the essential components of the solution I got to work.
The main body of the code passes a URL to
Thanks MRAB as well. I've printed all of the replies to retain with my
pile of essential documentation.
To follow up with a complete response, I'm ripping out of my mechanize
module the essential components of the solution I got to work.
The main body of the code passes a URL to the scrape_record
On Dec 30, 12:31 pm, Philip Semanchuk wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Brian D wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm actually using mechanize, but that's too complicated for testing
> > purposes. Instead, I've simulated in a urllib2 sample below an attempt
> > to test for a valid URL request.
>
> > I'm attem
Brian D wrote:
On Dec 30, 11:06 am, samwyse wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D wrote:
What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
then jump out of the "while True" loop to proceed to another line of
code below the loop. There's probably faulty logic in this approach.
On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Brian D wrote:
I'm actually using mechanize, but that's too complicated for testing
purposes. Instead, I've simulated in a urllib2 sample below an attempt
to test for a valid URL request.
I'm attempting to craft a loop that will trap failed attempts to
request a U
On Dec 30, 11:06 am, samwyse wrote:
> On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D wrote:
>
> > What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
> > then jump out of the "while True" loop to proceed to another line of
> > code below the loop. There's probably faulty logic in this approach. I
>
On Dec 30, 10:00 am, Brian D wrote:
> What I don't understand is how to test for a valid URL request, and
> then jump out of the "while True" loop to proceed to another line of
> code below the loop. There's probably faulty logic in this approach. I
> imagine I should wrap the URL request in a fu
I'm actually using mechanize, but that's too complicated for testing
purposes. Instead, I've simulated in a urllib2 sample below an attempt
to test for a valid URL request.
I'm attempting to craft a loop that will trap failed attempts to
request a URL (in cases where the connection intermittently
12 matches
Mail list logo
