On Aug 28, 7:28 pm, Dustan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2:59 am, "A.T.Hofkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 2007-08-28, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 28, 11:00 am, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
>
> > >> It is well known that Python is appr
On Aug 28, 2:59 am, "A.T.Hofkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-08-28, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 11:00 am, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
>
> >> It is well known that Python is appreciated for its merit of concise.
> >> However, I found the over conci
On 2007-08-28, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 11:00 am, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It is well known that Python is appreciated for its merit of concise.
>> However, I found the over concise code is too hard to understand for
>> me.
>>
>> Consider, for instance,
>
On Aug 28, 11:00 am, Davy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It is well known that Python is appreciated for its merit of concise.
> However, I found the over concise code is too hard to understand for
> me.
>
> Consider, for instance,
> def known_edits2(word):
> return set(e2 for e1 in e
Hi all,
It is well known that Python is appreciated for its merit of concise.
However, I found the over concise code is too hard to understand for
me.
Consider, for instance,
def known_edits2(word):
return set(e2 for e1 in edits1(word) for e2 in edits1(e1) if e2 in
NWORDS)
Shall I understand
