On Aug 8, 9:08 pm, Brian Allen Vanderburg II
wrote:
> I've coded my own 'relpath' implementation for 2.5 (shown below) and I
> want to make sure it follows as closely as it should to 2.6 and later.
> I've got a question regarding that. When attempting to convert to a
> relative path and it is n
I've coded my own 'relpath' implementation for 2.5 (shown below) and I
want to make sure it follows as closely as it should to 2.6 and later.
I've got a question regarding that. When attempting to convert to a
relative path and it is not possible for some reason (different drive or
UNC share)
