On 06/11/2013 05:36, Dave Angel wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:45:15 -0600, Tim Chase
wrote:
You're assigning it to the bound function rather than calling the
function. Use the "call" operator:
data = infile.readlines()
Thanks for spoiling the lesson. Nicks needs to learn how to debug 4 l
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:45:15 -0600, Tim Chase
wrote:
You're assigning it to the bound function rather than calling the
function. Use the "call" operator:
data = infile.readlines()
Thanks for spoiling the lesson. Nicks needs to learn how to debug 4
line programs without someone giving him
On 11/05/2013 02:07 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
And now you have depraved Nikos of the opportunity to really learn
something. ...
I know you meant "deprived", but "depraved Nikos" sounds like a good
description to me. ;-)
-=- Larry -=-
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:34:53 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
>>> data = cur.fetchall
>>> for row in data:
> I see, but because of the traceback not being to express it more easily
> i was under the impression that data wasn't what i expected it to be.
data wasn't what you expected it to be.
The pr
Στις 5/11/2013 1:16 μμ, ο/η Dave Angel έγραψε:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:33:49 +0200, Nick the Gr33k
wrote:
Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
> Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former
returned
a row of data
Στις 5/11/2013 5:45 μμ, ο/η Tim Chase έγραψε:
On 2013-11-05 17:39, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
data = infile.readlines
You're assigning it to the bound function rather than calling the
function. Use the "call" operator:
data = infile.readlines()
-tkc
--
infile=open("myfile.txt")
data = i
As I read this thread, the original question was how to stuff
multiple values in a single sql column. Several people pointed out
that the proper way to handle multiple values related to the original
table is to use a second table or perhaps a many to many relationship
with and intermediate join t
On 2013-11-05 17:39, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> >>> data = infile.readlines
You're assigning it to the bound function rather than calling the
function. Use the "call" operator:
data = infile.readlines()
-tkc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Στις 5/11/2013 3:15 μμ, ο/η Dave Angel έγραψε:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:25:41 +0200, Nick the Gr33k
wrote:
i tried inserting a type function to notify me of the datatype of
'data'
but that didnt help too.
What did that print show ? In what way didn't it help?
It said the type was Charles
It
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 14:25:41 +0200, Nick the Gr33k
wrote:
i tried inserting a type function to notify me of the datatype of
'data'
but that didnt help too.
What did that print show ? In what way didn't it help?
It said the type was Charles
It didn'tprint anything
It gave some other error
It
Op 05-11-13 13:25, Nick the Gr33k schreef:
>
> # fetch those columns that act as lists but are stored as strings
> cur.execute('''SELECT refs, visits, downloads FROM visitors WHERE
> counterID = %s and host = %s''', (cID, host) )
> data = cur.fetchone()
>
> print( type(data) )
> sys.exit(0
Στις 5/11/2013 1:49 μμ, ο/η Steven D'Aprano έγραψε:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:33:49 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former returned
a row of dat
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:33:49 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>
>> Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
>
>
>
> fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former returned
> a row of data while the latter returned a list of ro
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:33:49 +0200, Nick the Gr33k
wrote:
Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
> Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former
returned
a row of data while the latter returned a list of rows of dat
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:34:53 +0200, Nick the Gr33k
wrote:
I see, but because of the traceback not being to express it more
easily
i was under the impression that data wasn't what i expected it to
be.
Exactly. So why didn't you act on that impression?
Your error message told you that data wa
Op 05-11-13 11:33, Nick the Gr33k schreef:
> Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
>
>> Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
>
>
>
> fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former returned
> a row of data while the latter returned a list of rows of data.
Fro
Στις 5/11/2013 12:20 μμ, ο/η Antoon Pardon έγραψε:
Did you read the documentation of fetchone?
fetchone is like fetchall except from the fact that the former returned
a row of data while the latter returned a list of rows of data.
I dont know why it copmains about:
TypeError: 'NoneType' o
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:10 PM, M.F. wrote:
> That is what the stack trace and Christ tried to inform you.
Let's go with "and Chris tried"... no need to promote me to deity status :)
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 05-11-13 10:56, Nick the Gr33k schreef:
> Στις 5/11/2013 11:34 πμ, ο/η Nick the Gr33k έγραψε:
>> Στις 5/11/2013 11:10 πμ, ο/η M.F. έγραψε:
>>> On 11/05/2013 04:54 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
===
data = cur.fetchall
>>> data = cur.fetchall()
>>> That is what the stac
Op 05-11-13 10:10, M.F. schreef:
> On 11/05/2013 04:54 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
>>
>>
>> ===
>> data = cur.fetchall
> data = cur.fetchall()
> That is what the stack trace and Christ tried to inform you.
And now you have depraved Nikos of the opportunity to really learn
something. I'm
Στις 5/11/2013 11:34 πμ, ο/η Nick the Gr33k έγραψε:
Στις 5/11/2013 11:10 πμ, ο/η M.F. έγραψε:
On 11/05/2013 04:54 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
===
data = cur.fetchall
data = cur.fetchall()
That is what the stack trace and Christ tried to inform you.
for row in data:
===
Στις 5/11/2013 11:10 πμ, ο/η M.F. έγραψε:
On 11/05/2013 04:54 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
===
data = cur.fetchall
data = cur.fetchall()
That is what the stack trace and Christ tried to inform you.
for row in data:
===
The only thing i can understand by looking the abov
On 11/05/2013 04:54 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
===
data = cur.fetchall
data = cur.fetchall()
That is what the stack trace and Christ tried to inform you.
for row in data:
===
The only thing i can understand by looking the above 2 lines is this:
'for' fails to iterate
Στις 5/11/2013 10:21 πμ, ο/η Chris Angelico έγραψε:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
How is ti possible for data to be none iterable?
Do you know how to call a method in Python? If not, go back to the
beginning of the tutorial and start reading. If so, look through your
c
Στις 5/11/2013 10:21 πμ, ο/η Chris Angelico έγραψε:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
How is ti possible for data to be none iterable?
Do you know how to call a method in Python? If not, go back to the
beginning of the tutorial and start reading. If so, look through your
c
Op 05-11-13 09:21, Chris Angelico schreef:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
>> How is ti possible for data to be none iterable?
>
> Do you know how to call a method in Python? If not, go back to the
> beginning of the tutorial and start reading. If so, look through your
> c
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> How is ti possible for data to be none iterable?
Do you know how to call a method in Python? If not, go back to the
beginning of the tutorial and start reading. If so, look through your
code and see where you have a 'method' object that you
Στις 5/11/2013 8:54 πμ, ο/η Nick the Gr33k έγραψε:
Στις 5/11/2013 12:46 πμ, ο/η Denis McMahon έγραψε:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:03:58 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
There is no built in support in the python / mysql system for puttinga
list straight into a database, because mysql does not have"col
Στις 5/11/2013 12:46 πμ, ο/η Denis McMahon έγραψε:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:03:58 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
There is no built in support in the python / mysql system for puttinga
list straight into a database, because mysql does not have"collection"
record type.
Does postgresql has this 'co
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:03:58 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> Please since this column you mentioned is able to store a Python's list
> datatype could you tell me what needs alternation in:
We've already told you, there is NO mysql datatype that can store a
python list directly. There are ways of
Στις 3/11/2013 2:16 μμ, ο/η Roy Smith έγραψε:
In article ,
Gregory Ewing wrote:
Nick the Gr33k wrote:
I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table
for that if we can have a column that can store
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> The limitation, of course, is that the data is opaque as far as the
> database goes; you can't do queries against it. But, if all you need to
> do is store the list and be able to retrieve it, it's a perfectly
> reasonable thing to do, and a lot
In article ,
Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> > I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
> > of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table
> > for that if we can have a column that can store a list of values.
>
> Relational
Op 03-11-13 07:06, Gregory Ewing schreef:
> Nick the Gr33k wrote:
>> I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array of
>> elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table for that
>> if we can have a column that can store a list of values.
>
> Relationa
Nick the Gr33k wrote:
I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table
for that if we can have a column that can store a list of values.
Relational database systems typically don't provide any
such typ
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
>> wrote:
>> > Suppose a database allowed structured values like lists of strings,
>> > lists of numbers, or even lists of such lists and more. Then it
In article ,
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
> wrote:
> > Suppose a database allowed structured values like lists of strings,
> > lists of numbers, or even lists of such lists and more. Then it would
> > actually be a Python issue how best to support th
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
wrote:
> Suppose a database allowed structured values like lists of strings,
> lists of numbers, or even lists of such lists and more. Then it would
> actually be a Python issue how best to support that database.
PostgreSQL supports some higher-le
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:40:58 -0700, rusi wrote:
> That Codd...
> Should have studied some computer science
>
> [Ive a vague feeling I am repeating myself...]
ROFL. Get thee into FNF!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rusi writes:
> On Saturday, November 2, 2013 10:13:06 PM UTC+5:30, Denis McMahon wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:25:31 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
>
> > > I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an
> > > array of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate
> >
On 02/11/2013 17:40, rusi wrote:
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 10:13:06 PM UTC+5:30, Denis McMahon wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:25:31 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate
On Saturday, November 2, 2013 10:13:06 PM UTC+5:30, Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:25:31 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> > I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
> > of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table
> > for that if
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:25:31 +0200, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
> I just want a mysql column type that can be eligible to store an array
> of elements, a list that is, no need for having a seperate extra table
> for that if we can have a column that can store a list of values.
You'd better take that up
Στις 2/11/2013 3:03 μμ, ο/η Andreas Perstinger έγραψε:
On 02.11.2013 12:58, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
Trying to add the current filename into the existent 'downloads' column
Somehow i don't think i just use the plus sign into an existing column.
We don't try to add numbers here but add an extra stri
On 02.11.2013 12:58, Nick the Gr33k wrote:
Trying to add the current filename into the existent 'downloads' column
Somehow i don't think i just use the plus sign into an existing column.
We don't try to add numbers here but add an extra string to an already
existing array of strings(list).
[SNI
Trying to add the current filename into the existent 'downloads' column
Somehow i don't think i just use the plus sign into an existing column.
We don't try to add numbers here but add an extra string to an already
existing array of strings(list).
==
46 matches
Mail list logo
