On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Larry Martell writes:
>
>> I have an XML file that looks like this (this is just the pertinent
>> part, the file is huge):
>
> It's also not a very helpful schema. Elements called “Node”, where the
> actual type of element is in an attribute, ju
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> I have an XML file that looks like this (this is just the pertinent
>> part, the file is huge):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> KA21
>>
Larry Martell writes:
> I have an XML file that looks like this (this is just the pertinent
> part, the file is huge):
It's also not a very helpful schema. Elements called “Node”, where the
actual type of element is in an attribute, just make your job needlessly
harder.
They also pointlessly fo
Larry Martell wrote:
> I have an XML file that looks like this (this is just the pertinent
> part, the file is huge):
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> KA21
> KA21
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
I have an XML file that looks like this (this is just the pertinent
part, the file is huge):
KA21
KA21
00:00:00
15/03/2014 05:56: