"Robert" wrote in message
news:hk729b$na...@news.albasani.net...
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Robert, 01.02.2010 14:36:
>>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert, 31.01.2010 20:57:
> I tried lxml, but after walking and making changes in the element
> tree,
> I'm forced to do a full serializ
Robert wrote:
> I think you confused the logical level of what I meant with "file
> position":
> Of course its not about (necessarily) writing back to the same open file
> (OS-level), but regarding the whole serializiation string (wherever it
> is finally written to - I typically write the auto-con
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert, 01.02.2010 14:36:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert, 31.01.2010 20:57:
I tried lxml, but after walking and making changes in the element tree,
I'm forced to do a full serialization of the whole document
(etree.tostring(tree)) - which destroys the "human edited" format of
Robert, 01.02.2010 14:36:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Robert, 31.01.2010 20:57:
>>> I tried lxml, but after walking and making changes in the element tree,
>>> I'm forced to do a full serialization of the whole document
>>> (etree.tostring(tree)) - which destroys the "human edited" format of the
>>>
Robert wrote:
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert, 31.01.2010 20:57:
I tried lxml, but after walking and making changes in the element tree,
I'm forced to do a full serialization of the whole document
(etree.tostring(tree)) - which destroys the "human edited" format of the
original HTML code. makes it
Stefan Behnel wrote:
Robert, 31.01.2010 20:57:
I tried lxml, but after walking and making changes in the element tree,
I'm forced to do a full serialization of the whole document
(etree.tostring(tree)) - which destroys the "human edited" format of the
original HTML code. makes it rather unreadab
