Re: PEP: Generalised String Coercion

2005-08-22 Thread wolf
hi, i guess that anyone reading this pep will agree that *something* must be done to the state of unicode affairs in python. there are zillions of modules out there that have str() scattered all over the place, and they all *break* on the first mention of düsseldorf... i'm not quite sure myself h

Re: Generalised String Coercion

2005-08-06 Thread John Roth
"Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> PEP: 349 >> Title: Generalised String Coercion > ... >> Rationale >>Python has had a Unicode string type for some time now but use of >>it is not yet wi

Re: Generalised String Coercion

2005-08-06 Thread Terry Reedy
> PEP: 349 > Title: Generalised String Coercion ... > Rationale >Python has had a Unicode string type for some time now but use of >it is not yet widespread. There is a large amount of Python code >that assumes that string data is represented as str instances. >

PEP: Generalised String Coercion

2005-08-06 Thread Neil Schemenauer
The title is perhaps a little too grandiose but it's the best I could think of. The change is really not large. Personally, I would be happy enough if only %s was changed and the built-in was not added. Please comment. Neil PEP: 349 Title: Generalised String Coercion Version: $Rev