On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Devin Jeanpierre
wrote:
> When people boycott a product, it isn't because not having the product
> is better than having the product. That's clearly untrue: despite the
> reasons for the boycott, the product has some value.
That's because you don't call it boycot
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:56:42 -0700, rusi wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:51:07 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> > When people boycott a product, it isn't because not having the
>> > product is better than having the product. That's clearly untrue:
>> > despite the reasons for the boycott, the pr
As a scientist I would be more than happy to publish in Open-Access Journals
rather than in IEEE/ACM/Springer-published ones. However, I also have to be
sure that my publications reach the scientific community and make an impact on
it. Unfortunately, in many fields AFAIK the better journals (= h
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:51:07 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> > When people boycott a product, it isn't because not having the product
> > is better than having the product. That's clearly untrue: despite the
> > reasons for the boycott, the product has some value. They boycott it
> > because by
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:51:07 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>> Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python,
>>> my opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
>>> freely available, not eve
On Jul 24, 9:28 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:56 PM, rusi wrote:
> > "How many of you use Linux?" I ask.
>
> The awkwardness is in the definition of the question. Many of the
> products that I buy will have, at some point, been carried by a truck,
> but I would answer "No"
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:56 PM, rusi wrote:
> "How many of you use Linux?" I ask.
The awkwardness is in the definition of the question. Many of the
products that I buy will have, at some point, been carried by a truck,
but I would answer "No" if someone asked me if I use a truck. Would
you say t
On Jul 24, 7:51 am, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
> >> Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my
> >> opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
> >> freely available, not even an abstra
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>> Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my
>> opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
>> freely available, not even an abstract, they should not ask for valuable
>> free data from fr
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:44:27 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/23/2012 8:51 AM, Alexander Serebrenik wrote:
>> Do you participate in StackOverflow discussions?
>>
>> As a part of a joint on-going research effort of the Brunel University
>> (UK) and Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherland
On Monday 23 July 2012 19:42:29 Alexander Serebrenik did opine:
> 1) The paper referenced contains 4 pages, so it should be available via
> IEEXplore. Moreover, you can find a copy on
> http://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/MSR2012.pdf
>
> 2) Since the survey is only one of the techniques we intend to
1) The paper referenced contains 4 pages, so it should be available via
IEEXplore. Moreover, you can find a copy on
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/MSR2012.pdf
2) Since the survey is only one of the techniques we intend to use, and it will
be augmented by analysing the data publicly available i
On 7/23/2012 6:01 PM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
Leaving aside questions of relevance to the email list and the quality
of results from a self-selected survey, the PDF is linked directly from
the Google Scholar link in the original post: "[PDF] from tue.nl".
You're right, off to the side where I mis
Terry Reedy wrote:
Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my
opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
freely available, not even an abstract, they should not ask for valuable
free data from freely donated time.
Thanks, Terry! Save me s
On 01/-10/-28163 01:59 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
This is a deceptive and time-wasting link
Leaving aside the point that this is not directly related to Python, my
opinion is that if the authors will not make past and future papers
freely available, not even an abstract, they should not ask for
On 7/23/2012 8:51 AM, Alexander Serebrenik wrote:
Do you participate in StackOverflow discussions?
As a part of a joint on-going research effort of the Brunel
University (UK) and Eindhoven University of Technology (The
Netherlands) on the impact of collaboration sites on the developers
communit
hoven University of
Technology, NL; SO userid: 1285620]
Discussion of this survey on Meta Stack Overflow:
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/139901/gender-representativeness-and-reputation-in-stackoverflow
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
17 matches
Mail list logo
