In article ,
Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:36:25 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> > Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > > Heh! You make it sound that the character model is the most important
> > > thing
> > > in choosing a language!
> > > There are people using Fortran -- with not i
On 25/08/2014 16:04, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Thank goodness for Python3, which has freed us from these archaic
confusions.
It had to happen. Cue our resident unicode expert who will tell us yet
again how fatally flawed the FSR is but once again fail to explain why.
Hum, which microbenchmark
Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick :
>>> >>> display artist names like M�tley Cr�e and Beyonc�, I would be more
>>> >> Your mail client seems to be 7-bit ASCII!!
>>> > No it came through fine here, originally.
>>
>>> I saw it fine (news:comp.lang.python>), but there were no MIME
>>> headers. MIME might not
On Mon, Aug 25, Michael Torrie wrote:
> No it came through fine here, originally. It must be Google Groups that
> messed up the characters in displaying the message and in your reply.
Likely not. The header I got with msgid
lacks basic headers like
"Content-Type:" and "Content-Transfer-Encoding
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 7:56:55 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Michael Torrie:
>
>> > On 08/25/2014 06:24 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> >>> display artist names like M�tley Cr�e and Beyonc�, I would be more
>> >> Your mail client seems to
On Monday, August 25, 2014 7:56:55 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Michael Torrie:
> > On 08/25/2014 06:24 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >>> display artist names like M�tley Cr�e and Beyonc�, I would be more
> >> Your mail client seems to be 7-bit ASCII!!
> > No it came through fine here, origina
Michael Torrie :
> On 08/25/2014 06:24 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>>> display artist names like M�tley Cr�e and Beyonc�, I would be more
>>
>> Your mail client seems to be 7-bit ASCII!!
>
> No it came through fine here, originally. It must be Google Groups
> that messed up the characters in displayi
On 08/25/2014 06:24 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>> ... I wouldn't care much if I could only print 7-bit ascii.
>> If I was writing code to serve music on the web and had to
>> display artist names like M�tley Cr�e and Beyonc�, I would be more
>> concerned about the character model.
>
> Funny!!
> Your
On Monday, August 25, 2014 5:36:25 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Heh! You make it sound that the character model is the most important thing
> > in choosing a language!
> > There are people using Fortran -- with not intention of finding
> > an alternative.
> Different p
In article ,
Rustom Mody wrote:
> Heh! You make it sound that the character model is the most important thing
> in choosing a language!
> There are people using Fortran -- with not intention of finding
> an alternative.
Different people have different needs. If I was writing code to do
number
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Monday, August 25, 2014 9:11:39 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Sure. And your reduction of AWS bills sounds great. Just make sure you
>> don't consume the entire extra coder's time doing things that Python
>> would have done for you
Rustom Mody :
> Heh! You make it sound that the character model is the most important
> thing in choosing a language!
That's because the "character model" is the raison-d'être for Python3.
As far as Go goes, I think it's an interesting approach, but marred by
the Google tie-in. You must have a G
On Monday, August 25, 2014 9:11:39 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Sure. And your reduction of AWS bills sounds great. Just make sure you
> don't consume the entire extra coder's time doing things that Python
> would have done for you. Go's character model is inferior to Python
> 3's (or at l
On 8/24/2014 10:57 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
my initial reason for even looking at GO, was because, I noticed that if
I wanted to move my largest clients app from Python 2.x to 3.x it was
almost a rewrite.
idlelib comprises about 60 .py files. The 2.7 versus 3.4 versions are
perhaps 99%
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> I remember doing some browsing around, and the pooco people that make jinja2
> were not fans of python3(I forget the blog post), I got scared because a
> very large portion of my income was based on a single client... So since we
> were hav
gt; almost a
> > rewrite. and then when I noticed the libraries for python 3.x were
> > limited, and some python 2.x libraries are not even making a 3.x
> version...
> >
> > Well I got scared, Go started to look attractive, because your no longer
> > comparin
> limited, and some python 2.x libraries are not even making a 3.x version...
>
> Well I got scared, Go started to look attractive, because your no longer
> comparing GO to the entire python community, it is GO vs python 3...
If your Python 2 -> Python 3 transition was "almost
2.x libraries are not even making a 3.x version...
Well I got scared, Go started to look attractive, because your no longer
comparing GO to the entire python community, it is GO vs python 3...
thats just my 2 cents, I like python and it pays my bills... but I hate the
way python delt with the 2.x -
I spent a few weeks looking at Go and have to say you can see a lot of
Python's influence in Go, however my question to this list for others who
are doing real work with Go and Python have you encountered any scenarios
in which Go outmatched Python in terms of elegance or performance?
--RB
--
htt
19 matches
Mail list logo
