Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Python for philosophers

2013-05-18 Thread Citizen Kant
rusi said: > And let me suggest that you follow your own advise -- Can you say what > you have to say in 1/10th the number of words? Ok if not 1/10th then > 1/5th? 1-third? Thanks for the suggestion. I apologize for being that expansive; maybe you are right about this. In my world less use to be

Re: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Python for philosophers

2013-05-16 Thread Chris Angelico
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:46 PM, rusi wrote: > IOW a programmer is one who quickly and easily comes to the nub/core/ > kernel/essence of a problem and as easily and adroitly shaves off the > irrelevant. +1. This is a fairly good description of a programmer's job. Of course, that's the theoretic

Re: Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Python for philosophers

2013-05-16 Thread rusi
On May 16, 5:28 pm, Citizen Kant wrote: > > I'm just an honest and polite guy asking you guys a couple of simple out of > the box questions that are important for me. Everyone here has the freedom > to keep on with their own assumptions and beliefs. If someone's interested > on thinking outside th

Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: Python for philosophers

2013-05-16 Thread Citizen Kant
On May 16, 5:55 am, Citizen Kant wrote: > As a matter of > class, the word python names first a python snake than a Monty Python, > which is 50% inspired by that python word, word that's been being > considered the given name of a particular kind of snake since times in > which Terry Gilliam wasn'