%s got the job done!!!
Thank you all for the info and links,
I appreciate it!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
Python does not support REAL numbers. It has float number, which
are approximations of real numbers. They behave almost, but not
quite, like you might expect.
It also has Decimal numbers. They also approximate real numbers,
but slightly differently. They might behave more like you'd ex
Alvaro Lacerda wrote:
> The code I wrote is supposed to ask the user to enter a number;
> Then tell the user what's going to happen to that number (x / 2 + 5) ;
> Then give the user an answer;
>
> I succeeded getting results from even numbers, but when I try diving an
> uneven number (i.e. 5) by
2012/12/30 Alvaro Lacerda :
> The code I wrote is supposed to ask the user to enter a number;
> Then tell the user what's going to happen to that number (x / 2 + 5) ;
> Then give the user an answer;
>
> I succeeded getting results from even numbers, but when I try diving an
> uneven number (i.e. 5
On 30-12-2012 23:37, Alvaro Lacerda wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get full number result using the %d command
Try %f instead. %d is the formatting symbol for integer numbers.
See http://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#string-formatting-operations
Or have a look at what string.format() can do:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Lacerda wrote:
> The code I wrote is supposed to ask the user to enter a number;
> Then tell the user what's going to happen to that number (x / 2 + 5) ;
> Then give the user an answer;
>
Try x / 2.5 + 5
>
> I succeeded getting results from even numbers, b
The code I wrote is supposed to ask the user to enter a number;
Then tell the user what's going to happen to that number (x / 2 + 5) ;
Then give the user an answer;
I succeeded getting results from even numbers, but when I try diving an uneven
number (i.e. 5) by 2, I get only the whole number (i.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> code files? What's the regular expression for
> locating a number with an arbitrary number of digits
> seperated into an arbitrary number of blocks of an
> arbitray number of digits with an arbitrary number
> of whitespace characters between each bloc
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:10:53 -0300, Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>>
>>> There are various things I like about the D language that I think Python
>>> too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly sy
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The str.split method has no bearing on this discussion,
>
> It most certainly does. To make '123 456' into an integer,
> you split it and then join it.
Indeed. Which has nothing to do with the Python syntax for creating a
numeric literal in cod
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, just as
>
> >>> int('123' '456')
> 123456
>
> is not an error, the proposal is that
>
> >>> a = 123 456
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
> will not be an error either.
More directly: Just as these three statements create the
On 26/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The str.split method has no bearing on this discussion,
> It most certainly does. To make '123 456' into an integer,
> you split it and then join it.
> >>> z = '123 456'
> >>> y = z.split()
> >>> x = ''.join(y)
> >>> w = int(x)
> >>> w
rscore idea
from D, and I like it better than the "concatenation" idea, even though I
agree that it is more consistent with Python's string-format rules.
Regards,
Ryan Ginstrom
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jul 25, 7:22 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> > > Stargaming wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>
>
On Jul 26, 12:18 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IDLE 1.2c1
> > >>> s = '123 456'
> > >>> s.split()
> > ['123', '456']
>
> The str.split method has no bearing on this discussion,
It most certainly does. To make '123 456' into an integ
On Jul 26, 1:24 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Jul 25, 9:04?pm, Steven D'Aprano
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why does it make no sense? Have you never had to scrape a web page
> > or read a CSV file?
>
> Again, unrelated to t
On Jul 24, 10:10 am, Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
> > There are various things I like about the D language that I think Python
> > too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly syntactical ones):
>
> > 1) (we have discussed part of thi
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Propose:
> 123 456 789 => 123456789
> 123.456 789 => 123.456789
+1
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Sorry for the slow feedback.
Stargaming>Sounds like a good thing to be but the arbitrary
positioning doesnt make any sense.<
The arbitrary positioning allows you to denote 4-digit groups too in
binary/hex literals, like in my example:
auto x = 0b0100_0011;
Stargaming>fits into the current movem
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 25, 9:04?pm, Steven D'Aprano
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does it make no sense? Have you never had to scrape a web page
> or read a CSV file?
Again, unrelated to the way the Python compiler syntactically treats
the source code.
> So
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 25, 8:54?pm, Steven D'Aprano
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any number of whitespace characters? Just spaces or all whitespace
> characters?
> What about searching source code files? What's the regular
> expression for locating a number wit
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IDLE 1.2c1
> >>> s = '123 456'
> >>> s.split()
> ['123', '456']
The str.split method has no bearing on this discussion, which is about
the Python language syntax, and numeric literal values in particular.
--
\"Pinky, are you pondering w
On Jul 25, 9:04?pm, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:17:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Jul 25, 8:00 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
> >> > <[EM
On Jul 25, 8:54?pm, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:22:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> >> > Stargaming wrote:
> >> >> O
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:17:19 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Jul 25, 8:00 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Python already does:
>> > > "hello-" "world"
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:22:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
>> > Stargaming wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>>
>> >>> While i
On Jul 25, 8:00 pm, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Python already does:
> > > "hello-" "world" => "hello-world"
>
> > > Propose:
> > > 123 456 789 => 123456789
> > >
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Python already does:
> > "hello-" "world" => "hello-world"
> >
> > Propose:
> > 123 456 789 => 123456789
> > 123.456 789 => 123.456789
>
> So, spaces will no longer be delimiters
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:47:33 -0700, Paddy wrote:
> But then,what would _0 be, the number 0 or the name _0 analagous to
> a0
Of course the name because numbers have to start with a digit or a dot.
Otherwise this would break backwards compatibility.
Ciao,
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
--
http
On Jul 25, 1:22 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, spaces will no longer be delimiters? Won't that cause
> much wailing and gnashing of teeth?
>
I can't think of a circumstance in which
48 1906
is valid, so . . .
I like it, too :)
--
Star Weaver
--
http://mail.python.
On Jul 25, 1:47 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:10:53 -0300, Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>
> >> There are various things I like about the D language that I think Python
> >> to
On Jul 24, 6:08 pm, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> > Stargaming wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>
> >>> While in a syntax like:
> >>> for i in xrange(1_000_000):
> >>> my eyes help m
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Python already does:
> "hello-" "world" => "hello-world"
>
> Propose:
> 123 456 789 => 123456789
> 123.456 789 => 123.456789
>
>
I second that!
/W
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jul 25, 1:08 am, Steven D'Aprano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Underscores in numerics are UGLY. Why not take a leaf out of implicit
> string concatenation and allow numeric literals to implicitly concatenate?
>
> Python already does:
> "hello-" "world" => "hello-world"
>
> Propose:
> 123 456 789
En Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:10:53 -0300, Stargaming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>
>> There are various things I like about the D language that I think Python
>> too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly syntactical ones):
>>
>> 1) (we have
On Jul 24, 5:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There are various things I like about the D language that I think
> Python too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly syntactical ones):
>
> 1) (we have discussed part of this in the past) You can put
> underscores inside number literals, like 1_000_000,
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:09:00 +0200, Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> Stargaming wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>
>>> While in a syntax like:
>>> for i in xrange(1_000_000):
>>> my eyes help me group them at once.
>>
>> Sounds like a good thing to be but the arbi
Stargaming wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
>> While in a syntax like:
>> for i in xrange(1_000_000):
>> my eyes help me group them at once.
>
> Sounds like a good thing to be but the arbitrary positioning
> doesnt make any sense.
Checking underscore positions
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:19:53 -0700, bearophileHUGS wrote:
> There are various things I like about the D language that I think Python
> too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly syntactical ones):
>
> 1) (we have discussed part of this in the past) You can put underscores
> inside number literals,
There are various things I like about the D language that I think
Python too may enjoy. Here are few bits (mostly syntactical ones):
1) (we have discussed part of this in the past) You can put
underscores inside number literals, like 1_000_000, the compiler
doesn't enforce the position of such und
40 matches
Mail list logo
