umerical_libraries function to calculate an inverse matrix).
>
> What I wonder about, does anybody have a Fortran to Python conversion page
> somewhere to map some of the basic types to Python equivalents?
> What kind of speed difference should I expect?
When it comes to matrices the differ
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080104 19:21], Dennis Lee Bieber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> If the FORTRAN is using single precision reals, I'd expect a
>> slow-down in Python just on that alone, as Python uses doubles as the
>> only float type. There is also the overhead of o
-On [20080104 19:21], Dennis Lee Bieber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If the FORTRAN is using single precision reals, I'd expect a
>slow-down in Python just on that alone, as Python uses doubles as the
>only float type. There is also the overhead of object access for each.
In this case it use
-On [20080105 11:21], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Why convert? Modern Fortran is an object oriented, structured language
>with the singular advantage that it can run old Fortran programs.
With all due respect to Fortran but I find the syntax to be utterly
horrendous. :)
Furtherm
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> I got someone who asked me to make changes in an old Fortran program she is
> using for some calculations.
Why convert? Modern Fortran is an object oriented, structured language
with the singular advantage that it can run old Fortran programs.
--
http://ma
>
> What I wonder about, does anybody have a Fortran to Python conversion page
> somewhere to map some of the basic types to Python equivalents?
> What kind of speed difference should I expect?
Fairly large, if you insist on avoiding numpy. However, if your inputs are small
enough, i
-On [20080104 15:56], Robin Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>you probably want to look at numpy an extension that handles lots of matrix
>things with great ease. I think it now lives at http://scipy.org/
Yeah, I am aware of SciPy/NumPy, but aside from these two calls to do this
inverse matrix c
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080104 14:22], Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> What I wonder about, does anybody have a Fortran to Python conversion page
>> somewhere to map some of the basic types to Python equivalents?
>
> Just
-On [20080104 14:22], Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>What I wonder about, does anybody have a Fortran to Python conversion page
>somewhere to map some of the basic types to Python equivalents?
Just to share my own ideas:
Seems
COMPLEX*16/complex*16 ~= complex
I got someone who asked me to make changes in an old Fortran program she is
using for some calculations.
The calculations are pretty standard aside from 2 calls to DLINCG (an IMSL
numerical_libraries function to calculate an inverse matrix).
What I wonder about, does anybody have a Fortran to
10 matches
Mail list logo
