Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am implementing a forking SocketServer daemon that maintains significant
> internal state (a graph that takes ~30s to build by fetching from a SQL
> database, and eventually further state that may take up to an hour to
> build).
>
> I would like
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> Another possibility is that the signal handler simply sets a needs_update
> flag, which I could check for in a handle_request() loop. The disadvantage
> here is that the update wouldn't happen until after the next request is
> handled, and I would like the state to be ava
Hi folks,
I am implementing a forking SocketServer daemon that maintains significant
internal state (a graph that takes ~30s to build by fetching from a SQL
database, and eventually further state that may take up to an hour to
build).
I would like to be able to notify the daemon that it needs to
