Wiktor writes:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:37:56 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wiktor wrote:
>>> I guess, I'll try to do what Chris proposed. Forget about this
>>> implementation and write python script from the scratch looking only at the
>>> original JavaScrip
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 03:37:56 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wiktor wrote:
>> I guess, I'll try to do what Chris proposed. Forget about this
>> implementation and write python script from the scratch looking only at the
>> original JavaScript version. :-/
>
> Sadl
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Wiktor wrote:
> I guess, I'll try to do what Chris proposed. Forget about this
> implementation and write python script from the scratch looking only at the
> original JavaScript version. :-/
Sadly, that may be your only safe option.
Let this be a lesson to all:
On Thu, 29 May 2014 15:54:09 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to
>> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it,
>> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but tru
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to
>> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it,
>> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but true;
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to
> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it,
> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but true; some code dies
> because of a trivial thing like "Oops,
On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:31:56 +0200, Wiktor wrote:
> So, what should I do?
Thanks guys, you're right. I'll contact the Lion. ;-)
Yes, I forgot to mention that pwdhash.py was published under BSD licence.
Without knowing that I wouldn't even consider forking it.
--
Best regards, Wikto
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Duncan Booth
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to
>> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it,
>> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but true; some code dies
>> because of
Chris Angelico wrote:
> If you absolutely can't get in touch with him, the only option is to
> go back to the original protocol and manually reimplement it,
> completely ignoring this code. It's sad but true; some code dies
> because of a trivial thing like "Oops, I forgot to actually say that
>
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Wiktor wrote:
> I see few scenarios:
>
> 1) I'm trying to contact with original script's author, and send him my
> propositions of changes in code. (Oh, one more thing: my code isn't
> backward compatible, and I don't know Py2 that much to include all those
> try/
On 5/28/2014 8:31 PM, Wiktor wrote:
Hello.
There's script pwdhash https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pwdhash.py/0.1.1,
which I always* wanted to port to Python 3. (* - well, i.e. 6 months ;-))
I'm using this hashing algorithm quite often for years in my browser
(Opera plugin), so I thought that
Hello.
There's script pwdhash https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pwdhash.py/0.1.1,
which I always* wanted to port to Python 3. (* - well, i.e. 6 months ;-))
I'm using this hashing algorithm quite often for years in my browser
(Opera plugin), so I thought that it would be cool to have it as python
sc
12 matches
Mail list logo
