Tim Golden wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on a timesheet application in which I need to to find the
>> first pay period in a month that is entirely contained in that month
>> to calculate vacation time. Below are some example date ranges:
>>
>>
>> December 31, 2006J
On Sep 7, 2:47 am, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zentrader wrote:
> > On Sep 6, 7:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't earn
> >> January 14, 2007January 27, 2007 # does earn
> >> January 28, 2007February 10, 2007 # doesn't
>
On Sep 6, 6:41 pm, Zentrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 7:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't earn
> > January 14, 2007January 27, 2007 # does earn
> > January 28, 2007February 10, 2007 # doesn't
> > February 11, 2007
Zentrader wrote:
> On Sep 6, 7:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't earn
>> January 14, 2007January 27, 2007 # does earn
>> January 28, 2007February 10, 2007 # doesn't
>> February 11, 2007 February 24, 2007 # does
>
> Am I over si
On Sep 6, 7:56 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't earn
> January 14, 2007January 27, 2007 # does earn
> January 28, 2007February 10, 2007 # doesn't
> February 11, 2007 February 24, 2007 # does
Am I over simplifying if I say that sin
On Sep 6, 2:39 pm, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, your method is probably clearer to read whereas mine
>
> > doesn't require anything to be imported.
>
> I think I've been a SQL & Python programmer for so long that
> I tend to do anything -- and sometimes too much -- to avoid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sep 6, 12:41 pm, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Thanks! I'll try it both ways and see if there's any appreciable
>>> difference in speed, although since it will be packaged into an
>>> executable, that may not be an issue anyway.
>>> Mike
>> I honestly doubt
On Sep 6, 12:41 pm, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks! I'll try it both ways and see if there's any appreciable
> > difference in speed, although since it will be packaged into an
> > executable, that may not be an issue anyway.
>
> > Mike
>
> I honestly doubt there's any advantage t
> Thanks! I'll try it both ways and see if there's any appreciable
> difference in speed, although since it will be packaged into an
> executable, that may not be an issue anyway.
>
> Mike
I honestly doubt there's any advantage to my approach, certainly
not in terms of speed. It's really only if
On Sep 6, 10:57 am, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I am working on a timesheet application in which I need to to find the
> > first pay period in a month that is entirely contained in that month
> > to calculate vacation time. Below are some example d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a timesheet application in which I need to to find the
> first pay period in a month that is entirely contained in that month
> to calculate vacation time. Below are some example date ranges:
>
>
> December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't
Hi,
I am working on a timesheet application in which I need to to find the
first pay period in a month that is entirely contained in that month
to calculate vacation time. Below are some example date ranges:
December 31, 2006January 13, 2007 # doesn't earn
January 14, 2007January 27,
12 matches
Mail list logo
