Guilherme Polo wrote:
> 2008/3/21, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> I've been thinking of volunteering to "port" Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
>> > hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
>> > be a shame IMHO.
>>
>>
>> I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It
2008/3/21, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've been thinking of volunteering to "port" Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
> > hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
> > be a shame IMHO.
>
>
> I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It works just fine in 3k.
>
> O
> I've been thinking of volunteering to "port" Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
> hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
> be a shame IMHO.
I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It works just fine in 3k.
Of course, if you would port IDLE to Tk 8.5: that would be a useful
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Was looking at PEP 3108, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ ,
> and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
> used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
> it kept around or whether it is considered clutter.
>
> Th
On 21 Mar, 01:43, Simon Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been thinking of volunteering to "port" Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
> hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it.
That's because the forum for discussing these things wasn't mentioned
on comp.lang.python until two day
On Mar 20, 2:39 am, "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
> remove tkinter from the python core? PEP 3108 starts off with:
I really like Python since I started using it a couple years ago, but
this is a huge turnoff an
On Mar 19, 11:39 pm, "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Was looking at PEP 3108,http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/,
> > and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
> > used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
> > it kept arou
On 20 Mar, 08:39, "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thoughts anyone?
I don't use tk myself, but scheduling tkinter for vaporization would
be a bad idea. A lot of programs depend on it, and it doesn't look
ugly anymore (the one that ship with Python still does).
Would inclusion of
Paul Rubin:
> Python needs more stuff in its stdlib, not less.
> If Tkinter doesn't satisfy, then add Gtk (or whatever) to the standard
> distro. If that happens (i.e. some new toolkit is brought in and
> declared to be the standard) then it might be ok to drop Tkinter but
> it certainly shouldn't
> Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
> remove tkinter from the python core? PEP 3108 starts off with:
>
> Each module to be removed needs to have a justification as to why it
> should no longer be distributed with Python.
>From time to time someone makes a serious
"Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
> remove tkinter from the python core?
That would be terrible. Every time I've tried to use one of the other
packages it has led to installation hell. Tkinter isn't great, but
it
> Was looking at PEP 3108, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ ,
> and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
> used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
> it kept around or whether it is considered clutter.
>
> The PEP is going to be finaliz
Was looking at PEP 3108, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ ,
and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
it kept around or whether it is considered clutter.
The PEP is going to be finalized soon,
13 matches
Mail list logo
