On 26 June 2012 04:20, Saurabh Kabra wrote:
> Thanks guys
>
> I implemented a numpy array with fancy indices and got rid of the list and
> the loops. The time to do the mapping improved ~10x. As a matter of fact,
> the number of elements in array A to be summed and mapped was different for
> each
Thanks guys
I implemented a numpy array with fancy indices and got rid of the list and
the loops. The time to do the mapping improved ~10x. As a matter of fact,
the number of elements in array A to be summed and mapped was different for
each element in B (which was the reason I was using lists). B
On 25 June 2012 08:24, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Saurabh Kabra, 25.06.2012 05:37:
> > I have written a script to map a 2D numpy array(A) onto another array(B)
> of
> > different dimension. more than one element (of array A) are summed and
> > mapped to each element of array B. To achieve this I cre
Saurabh Kabra, 25.06.2012 05:37:
> I have written a script to map a 2D numpy array(A) onto another array(B) of
> different dimension. more than one element (of array A) are summed and
> mapped to each element of array B. To achieve this I create a list where I
> store the index of array A to be ma
I have written a script to map a 2D numpy array(A) onto another array(B) of
different dimension. more than one element (of array A) are summed and
mapped to each element of array B. To achieve this I create a list where I
store the index of array A to be mapped to array B. The list is the
dimensio
