On 3/07/2006 10:01 PM, Jon Clements wrote:
> John Machin wrote:
> (snip)
>> You have already been told: you don't need "self.", you just write
>> "self" ... self *is* a reference to the instance of the mystr class that
>> is being operated on by the substr method.
>>
> (snip)
>
> I get that; let m
John Machin wrote:
(snip)
>
> You have already been told: you don't need "self.", you just write
> "self" ... self *is* a reference to the instance of the mystr class that
> is being operated on by the substr method.
>
(snip)
I get that; let me clarify why I asked again.
As far as I'm aware, the
On 3/07/2006 7:55 PM, Jon Clements wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
>>
>> first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
>> After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
>> the slice of character
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
>
> first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
> After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
> the slice of characters between 3 and 4 =)
>
That's kind of funky - I
My experiance is mostly with old-style classes, but here goes.
first off, the question is actually easier than you think.
After all, self is an instance of a string, so self[3:4] would grab
the slice of characters between 3 and 4 =)
as for __init__, what I have found is that if you do not incl
Hi All,
I've reached the point in using Python where projects, instead of being
like 'batch scripts', are becoming more like 'proper' programs.
Therefore, I'm re-designing most of these and have found things in
common which I can use classes for. As I'm only just starting to get
into classes, I s
