> You got a lot of long-winded replies, but the short reply is that
> Twisted has packaged solutions for this.
> Seehttp://twistedmatrix.com/projects/core/enterprise
>
> "Twisted provides an interface to any Python DB-API 2.0 compliant
> database through an asynchronous interface which allows da
Snor wrote:
> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
> and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
> between using a threaded server, and using an event driven server. I've
> been told time and time again that I should use an event driven serve
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:33:59 GMT, Bryan Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Snor wrote:
>>> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
>>> and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
>>> between using a threaded serv
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> by running the database queries in one or more separate threads,
> you can still serve requests that don't hit the database (either
> because they're entirely self-contained, or because they only rely
> on cached data).
Nothing that couldn't also be solved without threads.
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 07:33:59 GMT, Bryan Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Snor wrote:
>> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
>> and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
>> between using a threaded server, and using an event driven server.
Snor wrote:
> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
> and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
> between using a threaded server, and using an event driven server. I've
> been told time and time again that I should use an event driven serve
Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
>> If that is not an option, then you are faced with a problem of
>> connecting a threaded programming model with an event based model
>> (twisted and and such).
>
> I don't really see how threads could avoid a problem with delays in
> one connection ...
by running the
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> If that is not an option, then you are faced with a problem of
> connecting a threaded programming model with an event based model
> (twisted and and such).
I don't really see how threads could avoid a problem with delays in
one connection ...
Regards,
Björn
--
BOFH
Good point. enterprise.adbapi is designed to solve the problem. The
other interface was deprecated.
Thanks,
Nick Vatamaniuc
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2006 13:13:32 -0800, Nick Vatamaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Snor wrote:
> >> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server fo
Try the --skip-networking option for mysqld
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Nick Vatamaniuc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The simplest solution is to change your system and put the DB on the
> > same machine thus greatly reducing the time it takes for each DB query
> > to complete (avoid the TCP stack com
29 Oct 2006 14:18:02 -0800, Paul Rubin <"http://phr.cx"@nospam.invalid>:
> "Nick Vatamaniuc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The simplest solution is to change your system and put the DB on the
> > same machine thus greatly reducing the time it takes for each DB query
> > to complete (avoid the TCP
"Nick Vatamaniuc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The simplest solution is to change your system and put the DB on the
> same machine thus greatly reducing the time it takes for each DB query
> to complete (avoid the TCP stack completely).
Since when do any db's let you avoid the TCP stack, even on
Snor wrote:
> As this occurs, there is a
> small amount of lag while the communication with the mySQL server takes
> place, and there could be another 100 clients waiting to make a request
> at this point, meanwhile the server is idling while waiting for a
> response from the mySQL server - obvious
On 29 Oct 2006 13:13:32 -0800, Nick Vatamaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Snor wrote:
>> I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
>> and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
>> between using a threaded server, and using an event driven server
Snor,
The simplest solution is to change your system and put the DB on the
same machine thus greatly reducing the time it takes for each DB query
to complete (avoid the TCP stack completely). This way you might not
have to change your application logic.
If that is not an option, then you are fac
Snor wrote:
> There is a lot of interaction between the clients and they would
> often need to write to the same list of values, which of course
> becomes a problem with a threaded server - so event driven solves
> that problem, and I assumed it would solve all my problems.
Which problem, and why
Snor wrote:
> Is the only solution to use a threaded server to let my clients make
> their requests and receive a response in the fastest possible time?
since the problem is that you need to wait for database anyway, maybe
you could use one or more threads to deal with the database, and keep
u
I'm attempting to create a lobby & game server for a multiplayer game,
and have hit a problem early on with the server design. I am stuck
between using a threaded server, and using an event driven server. I've
been told time and time again that I should use an event driven server
design (that is, u
18 matches
Mail list logo
