On 2/24/2023 7:00 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote:
On 2023-02-24 at 18:42:39 -0500,
Thomas Passin wrote:
VOWELS = 'aeiouAEIOU'
is_vowel = 'y' in VOWELS
If I really needed them to be in a list, I'd probably do a list
comprehension:
VOWEL_LIST = [ch for ch in VOWELS]
Why use a c
On 2023-02-24 at 18:42:39 -0500,
Thomas Passin wrote:
> VOWELS = 'aeiouAEIOU'
> is_vowel = 'y' in VOWELS
>
> If I really needed them to be in a list, I'd probably do a list
> comprehension:
>
> VOWEL_LIST = [ch for ch in VOWELS]
Why use a comprehension when a simple loop will do? ;-)
No. Wa
On 2/24/2023 5:35 PM, avi.e.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark,
I was very interested in the point you made and have never thought much about
string concatenation this way but adjacency is an operator worth using.
This message has a new subject line as it is not about line continuation or
comments.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 at 09:36, wrote:
> From what you say, concatenation between visibly adjacent strings is done
> once when generating bytecode. Using a plus is supposed to be about the same
> but may indeed result in either an error if you use anything other than a
> string literal
>
> bad =
Mark,
I was very interested in the point you made and have never thought much about
string concatenation this way but adjacency is an operator worth using.
This message has a new subject line as it is not about line continuation or
comments.
From what you say, concatenation between visibly adj
