Jacob Lee wrote:
> Funny enough, I'm working on a project right now that is designed for
> exactly that: PARLEY, http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley .
Have you seen Kamaelia? Some people have noted that Kamaelia seems to have a
number of similarities to Erlang's model, which seems to come from a common
On Thu, 10 May 2007 00:19:11 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
> [snip]
>> I do admit that Erlang's pattern
>> matching would be nice, although you can get pretty far by using uniform
>> message formats that can easily be dispatched on -- the tuple
>> (tag, sender, args, kwargs)
>> in the case of PARLEY
On Thu, 10 May 2007 01:03:39 -0700, jkn wrote:
> Have you seen Candygram?
>
> http://candygram.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> jon N
I did look at Candygram. I wasn't so keen on the method of dispatch (a
dictionary of lambdas that is passed to the receive function). It also
only works with threads
Have you seen Candygram?
http://candygram.sourceforge.net/
jon N
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 10, 8:31 am, Jacob Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Funny enough, I'm working on a project right now that is designed for
> exactly that: PARLEY,http://osl.cs.uiuc.edu/parley. (An announcement
> should show up in clp-announce as soon as the moderators release it). My
> essential thesis is th
On Wed, 09 May 2007 18:16:32 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
> Every once in a while Erlang style [1] message passing concurrency [2]
> is discussed for Python which does not only imply Stackless tasklets [3]
> but also some process isolation semantics that lets the runtime easily
> distribute tasklets
Every once in a while Erlang style [1] message passing concurrency [2]
is discussed for Python which does not only imply Stackless tasklets
[3] but also some process isolation semantics that lets the runtime
easily distribute tasklets ( or logical 'processes' ) across physical
processes. Syntactica
