On Nov 24, 8:43 pm, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> John Yeung wrote:
> > I'm generally pleased with difflib.SequenceMatcher: It's probably not
> > the best available string matcher out there, but it's in the standard
> > library and I've seen worse in the wild. One thing that kind of
> >
John Yeung wrote:
> I'm generally pleased with difflib.SequenceMatcher: It's probably not
> the best available string matcher out there, but it's in the standard
> library and I've seen worse in the wild. One thing that kind of
> bothers me is that it's sensitive to which argument you pick as "s
On Mittwoch 24 November 2010, John Yeung wrote:
> Are there any
> simple adjustments that can be made without sacrificing (too
> much) performance?
>>> difflib.SequenceMatcher(None,*sorted(('BYRD','BRADY'))).ratio()
0.3
--
Wolfgang
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyt
I'm generally pleased with difflib.SequenceMatcher: It's probably not
the best available string matcher out there, but it's in the standard
library and I've seen worse in the wild. One thing that kind of
bothers me is that it's sensitive to which argument you pick as "seq1"
and which you pick as
