On 12/22/2014 05:29 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
I figure I must be misunderstanding something in your explanation, since a
brute-force password guesser would seem to only need four billion tries to
(probably) crack that.
As to the assump
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Dave Angel wrote:
> I figure I must be misunderstanding something in your explanation, since a
> brute-force password guesser would seem to only need four billion tries to
> (probably) crack that.
>
> 1) Are you assuming that the cracker can read the source code, b
On 12/22/2014 12:25 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
There's one exception. Writing your own crypto is a bad idea if that
means reimplementing AES... but if you want something that's effective
on completely different levels, sometimes it's best to write your own.
I had a project a while ago that needed
