On 16/07/19 10:57 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Jul2019 10:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:17 AM DL Neil
wrote:
When used, do you embed a class's name within its own code, as a
literal?
[...]
So, what about other situations where one might need to access the
class's o
On 16Jul2019 10:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:17 AM DL Neil wrote:
When used, do you embed a class's name within its own code, as a
literal?
[...]
So, what about other situations where one might need to access the
class's own name or that of its/a super-class? eg
clas
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:17 AM DL Neil wrote:
>
> When used, do you embed a class's name within its own code, as a literal?
>
>
> In the thread "super or not super?", the OP asked:
> <<<
> C1.__init__(self) or
> super().__init__()
> >>>
>
> One of the answers recommended super()
When used, do you embed a class's name within its own code, as a literal?
In the thread "super or not super?", the OP asked:
<<<
C1.__init__(self) or
super().__init__()
>>>
One of the answers recommended super() [agreed!] in order to avoid
embedding "C1" into the code. The expl
