Re: Distutils vs. Extension header files

2004-12-10 Thread Mike Meyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cooke) writes: > vincent has the solution (you need to specify them in MANIFEST.in), > but I'll add my 2 cents. Yup. That solved the problem. > depends = [...] is used in building (it's like dependencies in make). > If one of those files change, distutils will rebuild

Re: Distutils vs. Extension header files

2004-12-10 Thread David M. Cooke
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got a package that includes an extension that has a number of > header files in the directory with the extension. They are specified > as "depends = [...]" in the Extension class. However, Distutils > doesn't seem to do anything with them. > > If I do

Re: Distutils vs. Extension header files

2004-12-09 Thread vincent wehren
Mike Meyer wrote: I've got a package that includes an extension that has a number of header files in the directory with the extension. They are specified as "depends = [...]" in the Extension class. However, Distutils doesn't seem to do anything with them. If I do an sdist, the include files aren't

Distutils vs. Extension header files

2004-12-09 Thread Mike Meyer
I've got a package that includes an extension that has a number of header files in the directory with the extension. They are specified as "depends = [...]" in the Extension class. However, Distutils doesn't seem to do anything with them. If I do an sdist, the include files aren't added to the tar