Kevin Walzer wrote:
> Tina I wrote:
>> Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
>
>> And maybe the smartest thing to do would be to dump PyQt and just go
>> for tkinter, however ugly it is :/
>
> Tkinter doesn't have to be ugly.
>
> I sell a proprietary Tkinter app commercially on OS X:
>
> http://www.codebykev
Tina I wrote:
> Kevin Walzer wrote:
> And maybe the smartest thing to do would be to dump PyQt and just go for
> tkinter, however ugly it is :/
Tkinter doesn't have to be ugly.
I sell a proprietary Tkinter app commercially on OS X:
http://www.codebykevin.com/phynchronicity-running.png
It tak
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Kevin Walzer a écrit :
>
> Note that if you go that way, neither Windows nor MacOS X are actually
> able to cleanly manage such dependencies (which is why the usual
> solution on these platforms - or at least on Windows - is to just bundle
> everything in a single b
David Boddie wrote:
> On May 16, 7:44 am, Tina I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A binary would be ideal. I'll look into the freeze modules and
>> Pyinstaller. Even if they don't handle huge things like Qt it would be a
>> step in the right direction if it handles smaller third part modules.
>> An
On May 16, 7:44 am, Tina I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A binary would be ideal. I'll look into the freeze modules and
> Pyinstaller. Even if they don't handle huge things like Qt it would be a
> step in the right direction if it handles smaller third part modules.
> And maybe the smartest thing t
Kevin Walzer a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>>> What platform are you doing this on? On the Linux platform,
>>> "dependency hell" of this sort is pretty much unavoidable,
>>
>> Yes it is. EasyInstall works just fine.
>
> You can install a beast like PyQt with easy_install? Meaning, tha
Kevin Walzer wrote:
>
> What platform are you doing this on? On the Linux platform, "dependency
> hell" of this sort is pretty much unavoidable, because there are so many
> different packaging systems (apt, rpm, and so on): it's standard to let
> the package manager handle these dependencies. A
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> What platform are you doing this on? On the Linux platform,
>> "dependency hell" of this sort is pretty much unavoidable,
>
> Yes it is. EasyInstall works just fine.
You can install a beast like PyQt with easy_install? Meaning, that it
will download and build/inst
Kevin Walzer a écrit :
> Tina I wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Is there a preferred way to distribute programs that depends on third
>> party modules like PyQt, Beautifulsoup etc? I have used setuptools and
>> just having the setup script check for the existence of the required
>> modules. If they'
Tina I wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Is there a preferred way to distribute programs that depends on third
> party modules like PyQt, Beautifulsoup etc? I have used setuptools and
> just having the setup script check for the existence of the required
> modules. If they're not found I have it exit with
Tina I a écrit :
> Hi list,
>
> Is there a preferred way to distribute programs that depends on third
> party modules like PyQt, Beautifulsoup etc? I have used setuptools and
> just having the setup script check for the existence of the required
> modules. If they're not found I have it exit wi
Hi list,
Is there a preferred way to distribute programs that depends on third
party modules like PyQt, Beautifulsoup etc? I have used setuptools and
just having the setup script check for the existence of the required
modules. If they're not found I have it exit with a message that it need
th
12 matches
Mail list logo
