robert wrote:
>
> as many libs are restriced to certain OS'es, and/or need/rely on
> extension modules, few tags would probably improve: OS'es,
> pure-python, dependeniess
I've added some platform notes, although the library dependencies of
various MPI and PVM solutions are sort of obvious, but I'
Paul Boddie wrote:
> A.T.Hofkamp skrev:
>> Let me add a few cents to the discussion with this announcement:
>
> [Notes about exec_proxy, batchlib and rthread]
>
> I've added entries for these modules, along with py.execnet, to the
> parallel processing solutions page on the python.org Wiki:
>
>
A.T.Hofkamp skrev:
>
> Let me add a few cents to the discussion with this announcement:
[Notes about exec_proxy, batchlib and rthread]
I've added entries for these modules, along with py.execnet, to the
parallel processing solutions page on the python.org Wiki:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Parall
On 2007-01-12, robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [1] http://www.python.org/pypi/parallel
>
> I'd be interested in an overview.
> For ease of use a major criterion for me would be a pure python
> solution, which also does the job of starting and controlling the
> other process(es) automatic
