On Mar 28, 8:37 pm, Jordan Meyer wrote:
> Is it possible to make a directly executable (such as .exe on Windows) file
> from scripts written in Python? So as to prevent the end-user from having to
> download an interpreter to run the program.
http://docs.python.org/faq/programming.html#how-can-
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:51:30 AM UTC-4, Paul Rudin wrote:
> Benjamin Kaplan writes:
>
> > If you can figure out a good way to compile a language like Python,
> > you'll be very rich. Yes, it is running the interpreter and then
> > running the bytecode on the interpreter. It's the same way Ja
On Mar 29, 12:16 am, harrismh777 wrote:
> Chris Rebert wrote:
> > Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
> >http://www.py2exe.org/
>
> Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files
> (compiling)... I don't buy it... it has to be reproducing the byte code
> in
> it has to be reproducing the byte code
> interpreter in the code segment and the byte code in the data segment...
> so that each .exe file created by said process is actually loading an
> entire copy of at least the byte code interpreter with each program
> "compiled" ...
Yes, if you think of i
On 2011-03-29, harrismh777 wrote:
> Chris Rebert wrote:
>> Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
>> http://www.py2exe.org/
>
> Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files
It is.
> (compiling)...
It isn't.
> I don't buy it...
Then don't.
> it has to b
harrismh777 wrote:
Chris Rebert wrote:
Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
http://www.py2exe.org/
Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files
(compiling)...
Yes and no. The python program is not being compiled. The Python
system, along with all
Benjamin Kaplan writes:
> If you can figure out a good way to compile a language like Python,
> you'll be very rich. Yes, it is running the interpreter and then
> running the bytecode on the interpreter. It's the same way Java and
> .NET work.
Not exactly AIUI. .NET bytecodes do actually get co
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:16 AM, harrismh777 wrote:
> Chris Rebert wrote:
>>
>> Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
>> http://www.py2exe.org/
>
> Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files (compiling)... I
> don't buy it... it has to be reproducing the
Chris Rebert wrote:
Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates such Windows executables:
http://www.py2exe.org/
Interesting... but it can't possibly be creating .exe files
(compiling)... I don't buy it... it has to be reproducing the byte code
interpreter in the code segment and the byte code in t
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Jordan Meyer wrote:
> Is it possible to make a directly executable (such as .exe on Windows) file
> from scripts written in Python? So as to prevent the end-user from having to
> download an interpreter to run the program.
Yes. py2exe is a tool which generates s
Is it possible to make a directly executable (such as .exe on Windows) file
from scripts written in Python? So as to prevent the end-user from having to
download an interpreter to run the program.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
11 matches
Mail list logo