In article <4c8b8123.80...@sschwarzer.net>,
Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
>
>Which approach would you prefer and why? Or some other approach? Would
>you use a different approach if the library-internal class was named
>`_FTPFile` instead of `FTPFile`?
If it's not a public class, it should have been na
Hello,
I maintain ftputil [1], an FTP client library.
Users of the library may use it like this:
| import ftputil
|
| with ftputil.FTPHost(server, userid, password) as ftp_host:
| # for example, make a remote file and read its content
| with ftp_host.open("remote_name", "rb") as remote_f
